The High Court of Telangana directed the 3rd respondent Tahsildar to conduct survey and demarcation of the petitioner's agricultural land in Medak District within two months, citing delays in processing the F-Line application.
Directed respondent No. 3 to conduct survey and demarcation of the agricultural land within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 8607 OF 2022
Between:
Jagga Jyothi Laxmi, w/o Madhava Rao, aged about 31 years, occ. Housewife, r/o H.No. 2-3-14, Tawaipura, Tarbund, Tirumalagiri, Secunderabad-500 009.
...PETITIONER
AND
1 The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad
The District Collector, lvledak District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of lt/andamus, declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in conducting the survey and demarcation of the petitioners agricultural and in Sy.No. 2/E admeasuring ac. 0.08 gts, situated at Chinna Gottimukkala village, Shivampet I,4andal, Medak Districl, inspile of submitting the F-Line application dl. 10-12-2021 duly enclosing the relevant documents through a written representation, followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct survey and demarcation of the above mentioned land.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent No. 3 herein to consider and take appropriate actionpursuant to the F-Line application dl. 10-12-2021 and the written representation,pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased topermit the petitioner lo amend the cause title with regard lo the name of the Districtin respect of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein as "Medak District" in theplace of "Sanga Reddy District", in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. SATYANARAYANA GUOIVAOA
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
/\
THE HI )NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. 'IJAYSEN ITEDDY
W.P.No.860 7 0F 2022
ORDER:
Hear I leamed counsel for the petitioner and the Assistant Govemme; t Pleader for Revenue.
I
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
GB
BS
HIGH COUR"
DATE D: 1 7/0',:12022
-tiiE S-fA
o..'
o
.J 0 i l4ln 422
ORDER
WP.No.8607 of 2022
DISPOSING )F THE WP
WITHOUT C CSTS.
)n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Tahsildar to conduct survey and demarcation of the petitioner's agricultural land.
Jagga Jyothi Laxmi
State of Telangana
District Collector, loanedak District
Tahsildar, Shivampet Arlandal, l\,4edak District
B. V JAYSSEN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
