Dismissed

G.Jayalakshmi v. The Joint Collector

Telangana HC16 Dec 2022WP/8098/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 8098 of 2009 filed by G. Jayalakshmi declaring an order illegal and contrary to the A.P. Lands Act. The court held that the cause no longer survived, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without orders as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

G.Jayalakshmi Vs The Joint Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

t^3302I

¶2

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 8098 OF 2009

¶8

Between:

¶9

G.Jayalakshmi, Wo. Madusudhan Rao, Aged 40 years, Occ:Housewife, R/o.H.No.17-2-870/40, Sri Nilayam Madannapet, Hyderabad -59.

¶10

,..PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rangareddy East, Goshamahal, Hyderabad , Boomagalla Ramaiah, S/o.Edaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

4 Boomagalla Pochaiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, Rt/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

5 Boomagalla Pandaiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

6 Boomagalla Buggaiah, S/o.Late Maisaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

7 Boomagalla Jangaiah, S/o.Late Maisaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Viltage of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶17

B Boomagalla Narsimha, S/o.Late Maisaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶18

Boomagalla Ramchandraiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districi.

¶19

Boomagalla Jangaiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶20

Boomagalla Edaiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶21

Boomagalla Yadaiah, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶22

l3.Boomagalla Kishan, S/o.Late Pullaiah, Aged not known, R/o. Gunagal Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶23

Boomagalla^tlarasimha, Sio.Late Chennaiah, Aged n,c. knov,rn, R/o. Gunagal Village of Ya;haram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶24

Boomagalla , \njaiah, S/o.Edaiah, Late Chennaiah, Aged iot known, R/o. Gunagal Vill: ge of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy D st'ict.

¶25

.. RESPONDENTS

¶26

Petition undtr Article 226 of the Constitution of lncia praying that in the circumstances stal3d rn the affidavit filed therewith, the l'ligfr Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particul,?rl/ r'rne n the nature of Writ of Mandamus: Declaring the order dt. 5.8.2008 of^'1st resprondent in Case No.F116480/2007 a; illegal, arbitrary and contrary to ther lett:rr and spirit of A.P. (T A.) Abolition of lr ams Act 1955.

¶27

Counsel for the Pel tioner: SRI VENUGOPALA RAO PASNOCTRL Counsel for the Rer pondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Res pondent No.3: BOYA RAVINDER REDE'/ Counsel for the Res pondent Nos. 4 to 15: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.8O98 of 2OO9

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶32

Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶33

As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶34

SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR PAO ASSISTANT REGISTAAR I //TRUE COPY/ta/l

¶35

To,

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

1 2 Two CCs One CC to to SRI GP FOR REVENUE ,High VENUGOPALA RAO PASNOORU Advocate Court for the State ot teirngina.tOpUCl lourl 2 One CC to SRI BOYA RAVTNDER REDDy Advocate [OpUC] 4 Two CD Copies KKS GJP

HIGH COUF T

DATED:16t1212022

4 Ll'-,r'.i q
,C': -1, ':(
N' :l
Jll-
.A s= .ti,,
& +, !- ;'
Ii. o .<br>1!-l ...i,
----aa:-r

¶43

ORDER

¶44

WP.No.8098 of 2009

¶45

DISMISSINC OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUC--UOUS WITHOUT C )STS

¶46

qA
fl' \o

G.Jayalakshmi v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Jayalakshmi v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.K.Parmeshwari,Mettuguda, Secunderabad Vs the State of Ap., Revenue Dept., Hyderabad and 3 Others

Smt. Singireddy Varalaxmi, Vs The Joint Collector-I

P.V.R.S. Kumar, Secunderabad. Vs the Jt. Collector-Ii, R.R. Dist.

M/s. Rane Engine Valve Limited, Vs The District Collector

Merugu Raja Mouli Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the

K.Amarender Reddy, Vs the Collector and District Magistrate, and 6 Others