The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging impugned proceedings due to non-prosecution and absence of the petitioner, treating it as a default case without awarding costs.
No relief; writ petition dismissed as non-prosecuted without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEI,4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 28499 OF 2008
Between:
K.Amarender Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy, Aged about 52 years, R/o. Plot No.120, Road No.13, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034
...PETITIONER
AND
(Since the Conditional Order dated 71912012 has not been complied with, the default clause of the said order has been given effect to and the writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as against the RR2&4t07)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction, one in the nature of writ of mandamus, i) declaring the impugned proceedings No.8211296412008 dated 12 11 .2OOB of the Respondent-1 as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, inoperative and the same may be set aside; ii) costs be awarded to the petitioner
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(w PMP. NO: 37347 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
';/
)
grant injunction res.rain ng the respondents 2-7nol to ilti)rfere with the possession and en]o tment of the petitioenrspropertyto an o) tent of 3 acres in Sy No 129/30(TS N, ) 22) road No.12,Banjara Hrlls, Shaikpet iV), Hyderabad, during thependency rf the writpetition
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2008(V1 PMP. NO: 37348oF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circttrnstancesstated in the affidavit filedii I supportof the petition,the High C)ourt rl€ry b': pleasedto suspend the rmpugn)d orderdaled12.112008of the RespottJent - 1 pending disposal of the writp( rtition
t.A. NO:1 OF 2009(1A PMP.NO:'14967OF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the citcu mst.rncesstated in the affidavit filed ir supportof the petition, the High Court rrary b,: pleasedto receive the material 1 apersfiled on be half of the respondent: . 3
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Between:
Syed Mohammed Zai(i . S/oLateSyed lfteqar Hussaln Zaidi, Age,l ;tbout 66 years, Obc: Business, R/o H. {o 22-3-910. Darusshifa,Hyderabad.
....RESPONDENT/\TJRIIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that tn thecitcu rrstzrncesstated in the affidavit filed it support of thepetition, the Htgh Courtnlay br:pleasedto
J
;--a/ E. / {.a: /i !:-:- ./' .// {
imoteadthe Petitioneras RespondentNo.8in the abovewrit petrtion, being the legalheir of the RespondentNo. 4 herein
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRl. C. S. SURYAPRAKASH RAO
Counselforthe Respondent No'1 GP FORREVENUE
Counselfor the RespondentsNo'2to7:NoneAppeared
The Courtmade the following: ORDER
THE t:C)NOURABLESRI IUSTICEK'Sr\ltA'rH
\VIIIT PETITIONNo.28499of 20q!
ORDER:
This petitiot.tis comit.tgfor hearing sirrt ':2(108 On 07.77.2022anc115 11.2022,whc-tr thc- mlltter nas callcd' therewas no representatiltr tln behaif of tlre petitioner' titttl therefore the matter wasdir et'tcd to be lisk'cl today under lLr: caption "for Dismissal".Il' c'r.r todav, wherr thc matter is callt'' [' there is no representation.It seems that thc petitioner is ntlt inl'erestedto prosecutethis r ase
for 2. Accortlirrglr', thi'{ritl)('titioll isdisrrr :'se..l
Non-prosl'cuti, rn/clefault.No orcleras to costs'
.:) Pen.1in11 nrisccllaneousa pplications,ifarrl', shall stand
closed
s d/ -M oH D s4N i li t;'#"t\tf^t //TRUECOPY// SEC:I'IONOFFICER
To,
1 Two CCsto GPF()R REVENUE 'High Courtfor the State r1 I elanganaat tJ t suRYA PRAKASH RAo' Advocate [ot)t]cl , 3I1"6t?3[?Y 3. TwoCD copies
BM
BS
BSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 6112,2022
ORDER
WP.No.28499 of 2008
?.-..1'
./ ,t.-> i AT€ o^.
/."
,t'o'
t-
t []t 1$8
:. -| , -. ,] l -r.'.|../.
DISMISSING'THE WRITPETITION WITHOI-ITCOSTS
(,
<br>s7 t9"#
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition alleging arbitrary proceedings should be allowed after non-prosecution.
K. Amarendra Reddy
The Collector And District Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad
Syed Sarfaraj Hussain
Syed Iteqar Hussain Zaidi
Syed Anwar Basha
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
