In a writ petition challenging landlord acquisition of agricultural land without due process, the petitioner's counsel appeared without instructions. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i4-t'f'"ih&tstfffi eYrd*f-'"t
t.
i i I I I I ! I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3302 ]
FRIDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION O: 1593 OF 2009
Between:
[\r'lerugu Raja Mouli, S/o. Yellaiah Agriculture RJo. DharmaramVillage,Parkal Mandal, Hanamkonda, District Waranga
..'ET'T'ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt.maybe pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l/andamus, declaring the action of the Respondents moreparticularly the action of the 4th respondent in dispossessing and acquiring AgriculturalLands comprised in Survey Number 135 corresponding to new surveyNo.591, admeasuring Ac.1-20 guntas, situated at Shyampet Village ofHanamkonda Mandal, District Warangal, belonging to me, without following the dueprocess of law, as illegal, arbitrary, high handed and violative of Fundamental and Constitutional Rights as guaranteed under Article 14, 19,21,31-A and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent to followthe process of law
l.A. NO: 1 O F 2009(WPMP. NO:2014 0F2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not todispossess the petitioner from the Agricultural Lands, comprised in SurveyNumber 135 correspondingto new survey No.591,
admeasuring Ac.1-20 guntas, situated at Shyampet Village, Hanamkonda lVlandal, District Warangal, by destroying the standing trees therein the said land, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. ANANDAM Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4:M/s. V. UMA DEVI The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.1593 of 2009
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no ir-rstructions from the petitioner and requested the Court to pass appropriate orders.
'for dismissal', the iearned Counsel for the petitioner is not ready to argue the matter, as there are no inslructions from the petitioner.
for Non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs
closed
SD/-K.AMMAJI / ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /rRuE coPY/ q)
SECTI.ONOFFICER
BM
BB ,uK
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611212022
ORDER
1 t\z S TA re:
q
.4
13 J A}I 20t3 C.
ooJ
,
*
.k o FS cl
WP.No.1593 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSEGUTION WITHOUT COSTS
@ro( ,^'',#
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajugulu Raja Mouli
State of Andhra Pradesh
Revenue Divisional Officer, Hanamkonda
Tahsildar, Hanamkonda
Andhra Pradesh Gramena Vikas Bank
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
