Single judge passed an order allowing W.P. No.7490 of 2019 on the same terms as a previously dismissed interlocutory order in W.P. No.111699 of 2019, forwarded miscellaneous pending petitions to be closed.
Pediion allowed in terms of order in W.P. No.111699 of 2019; misc. petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 74900F2019
Between:
Mukkola saiKiranRajveer,s/o.r/ukkolaYadaiah,.As"fl:r3"1i,.fil.nt;s;:iyl"s'f"'""? iv;. Bfti M:2,rrat ruo'3,Police Quarters'Madhapu ReddY District,Telangana'
".PETITtONER
AND
PetitionunderArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court fnaybe pleasedtoissueaWritororderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof mandamusdeclaringthe action of the 1st respondentin issuingthe proceedings dt:18-1-20'lBcancelling the provisional Rc.No05iE3(A3)/Rect/Cyb/2016-18' selectionof the petitioner to tfre post of SCT PC (AR) (lv1en) as illegalarbitrary t:: andun co nstitut'o nu' u no asain st *" ""|^:::. :::::"1 "1::i::':t'-'"""; set-a-sidethe sameand direct the 1st responc posto{ SCt PC (AR)(Men)with all consequentialbenefits'
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
/
/
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the proceedings Rc.No.0S/E5(A3)/Rect/Cyb/2016_1g, dt:.18-1_2018 cancelling the provisionar serection of the petitioner to the post of scr pc (AR) (Men) issued by the 1st Respondent.
Counsel for the petitioner : SRl. G. UMA RANI Counsel for the Respondents : Gp FOR SERVICES The Court made the following : ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.7490 0F 2019
ORDER:
'l'he learned counsel lor petitioner submits rhat the subject matlcr of this rvrit pctiriorl is squ:rrcll,covered by the order passed bv this Court in W.P,No.111699 of 2019 dated 27.8.20t9. 'lhe learned Govemment Pleader for Services does not dispute the same.
ln vieu of thr' same, iollorving thcordcr passedin W P No 111699 ol 2019 dated27 8.2019, this rvrit pel'rtion is alsoallc'wedin tcrms of rhereor.The mjscelraneouspetirions pcnding,ii any, sharl standclosed'
Theresha1l be no order as to costs
*??3,'fiffiE8l!?AiHI
//TRUECOPY//
seqrKowrcea'
TR
^x!
HIGH COURT
DATED:27 t04lZ02Z
ORDER
WP.No.7490 of 2O1g
'i .c!-l!i,
b4
o(
.N
C, C-: \
€-
-/
.), ..//
rH EswR I r P E,, o N f,,ii?Y.i} :
]_-,.-
l"t r
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding the quashing of seletion proceedings is maintainable given a prior order.
Mukkola saiKiranRajveer
Government of Telangana
Commissioner of Police Cyberabad Hyderabad
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
