High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding hospital zone allotment by directing respondents to consider the petitioner's appeal within eight weeks, relying on a previous similar order.
Directing respondents to consider petitioner's appeal/representation dated 01.01.2022 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THETWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 1248 20F 2022
Between:
Mohd.AbdulAleem,S/oM.ARaheman,aged56.years'OccMPHEO'O/o'or.' ofrrf fio, Ctiityal,'JayashanakarBoopalpally District'
.,.PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle226 of ihe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court may be pleasedtoissueanyotherappropriateWrit,orderordirectionmoreparticularly oneinthenatureofWritofMandamusbydeclaringtheactionoftherespondents in allotting thepetitioner to Zone -l Kaleswaram' instead of allotting to Zone-lV Badradri asperseniority, videimpugnedallotment ProcRc'No' HM/Dl/ZllI\4UPU/00l6,dated0B.0,l.2022andconsequentialpostingordersissued vide Proc.No.HM/Dl/ZllMUPU/0005dated 10 01'2022 by the 2nd and 3rd respondentsreSpectiVelyasillegalarbitrary,violativeofArticledl4andl6ofthe ConstitutionoflndiaandalsocontrarytotheguidelinesissuedvideG.o'Ms.No. 3lT,dt.6.l2.2o2landconsequentiallytheHonbleCourtmaypleasedtosetaside the impugnedallotment orderdated OB'01 '2022 and consequential posting orders dated10.01.2022wilh a further directionto the respondentsto allot the petitioner to Zone lV Badradrion par withhis juniors'
/
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI M'R'TAGORE
Counselfor the ResPondent No'3:GP FOR SERVICES-II
TheCourtmade the following: ORDER
.THE, HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY \'RII' P[TITION No. 12482of2022
ORI)ER:
l{ear<l Iearnedcounsel for the petltlonerand learned AssistantCovernrnent Pleaderfor Services-ll and perused the materialon record.
submissionof the leamed 3. Therefore,recording the aforesaid counseloneitherside,followingtheorderinW.P'No.36688of 2021 aodbatch dated 28'12'2O2f in terms thereof'this writ petition isdisposedof directing the respondents to consider the petitioner'sappeal/representationdatedOl'O12022 andpass appropriateorders thereon,in accordance with law' withina period o1'eight(8) wceks fi'om the date of receiptof a copyof this order'
No costs
Pendingmiscellaneouspetltlons'if any,shall standclosed.
Ass,3?lRisAJJ["1'jil //TRUECOPY// ('1t't/' SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 2 iHI,:, i:i#ftnd:i#js*#f fil H]lH it]" I'i# ^l;
2 Hyderabad.
!-_-..'
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710412022
E STAI c
aJ
i) 3 0 AI'il 202
*
<br>
ORDER
WP.No.12482 ot 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed by the High Court to have his appeal/representation for posting in a hospital zone received and disposed of by the respondents within eight weeks.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No. 36688 of 2021Referred¶2
Mohd AbdulAleem
The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Health Department
The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare
The District Collector, Jayashanakar Boopalpally District
B. Vijaissen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
