Allowed

M/s. Mahmood Builders Private Imited v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Feb 2022WP/7131/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the refusal of the District Collector to issue an E-Pattadar Passbook. The Court directed the respondent to process the pending application within four weeks pending the petitioner's compliance with a fee requirement.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 2 to pass appropriate orders on the application bearing No. 31 PRD0000945005 within four weeks.

M/s. Mahmood Builders Private Imited Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRES E NT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 7131 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

lvl/s. lvAHlvooD BUILDERS PRIVATE lN/lTED, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Mahmood Complex, Suite A, ll Floor, No.1-7-347 to 349, Parklane, Secunderabad-sooo03, represented by its Director ADNAN N/AH[/OOD.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶12

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Ranga Reddy Districl, Telangana State.

¶13

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, Kadthal lvandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

¶14

THE TAHSILDHAR (lvl.R.O.), Kadthal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to Honble Court may be pleased to^grant a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in lhe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.2 in issuing E-Pattadar Passbook in favour of Writ Petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Acres 4-28 Guntas in Survey Nos.126/21 ,126121 126121 , 126121 , situated at l,4udwin Village a Gram Panchayath, Kadtal l,4andal, Ranga Reddy District even though the status of the application bearing No.31 PRD0000945005, dated 14.09.2021 made through the Meeseva, Government of Telangana for issuance of Organisation^{Pattadar Passbook, reflects} thal^{it was} 'digitally signed at Tahsildhar' Et Jt. Registrar, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article^'19, 21 and^{300-Aof the Constitutionof lndia and} consequently direct the Respondents to issue^{E- Pattadar Passbookto the Writ} Petitioner in respect of land admeasuring^{Acres 4-28 Guntas in Survey Nos.126/2/,}

¶17

126t21 , 126121 ,126/2/ ,^{situatedat l'4udwinVillage Et Gram Panchayath'Kadtal} Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶19

PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct} the Respondents to^{issue E-PattadafPassbookto the writ Petitioner land in respect} of land admeasuring^{Acres4-28 Guntas in Survey Nos 12612/ ,126121} '¹²⁶¹²¹ ' 126121 , situated at^{N,4udwin Villagea GramPanchayath,Kadtal Mandal, Ranga} Reddy District, by^{duly reporting compliance to thisHon'ble Court.}

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: SRl. ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD}

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents^{: AGP FOR REVENUE}

¶22

The Court made the following^{: ORDER}

¶23

I IIII IIONOtllt.\lll.E SItl^{.rlrS I'lCE B' 'UAYSEL-ITEDDY}

¶24

\'. P.\o.71 I OF 202

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Heard learned counsel^{1'or the petitionerand the Assistant} Govemment^{Pleaderfor Revenue.}

¶27

The grievance ol'the^{petitioner is that respondent Nos'2and 4} are refusing to issue^{e-pattadar passbooks in favour of the writ} petitionel iu respcct of^{land adnreasuring Acs.4-28 Gts} ,ⁱⁿ Sy.Nos. l26i^2/eo ,^{l2(tl2le3.l2612lE, 12612l&, situated at Mudwin} Village and Ciram^{Panchayath, Kadtal Mandal,RangaReddyDistrict} in spite ol'ploceedings^{No.C/RoR/B/68I/20I8dated 02.06 20I8being} issued. whereundcr^{tnutationhas been sanctionedin the name of the} petitioner.

¶28

As is evic'lent^{fronr the mtltation proceedings, name of} petitioner, as purchaser,^{was directed to be incorporatedpursuant} to purchase of^{ploperty under registered a sale deedbearing} document No.4480^{of 2017 and orders have been issued for change} of patta in the^{name ofthe petitioner.Applicationbearing} No.31PRD0000945005^{dated l4.O9.2OZl has been submitted by the} petitioner through^{Meesevafor issuanceof pattadar passbook for the} subject land.

¶29

On enquiry fron^{learned Assistant CovernmentPleader,it is} submitted that the^{petitioneris required to pay Rs'300/-and on} payment oI such^{t'ec, thc applicationof the petitioner will be} processed.

¶30

Taking note of the above submissions of both sides, the writ

¶31

petition is disposed of directing respondenr No.2 to forthwith act upon the application ol the petitioner bearing No.3 I pRD0000945005 dated, 14.09.2021 in respect ol land admeasuring Acs.4-2g Cts., in Sy.Nos.126l2/eo, t26t2te+ n6t2ta, 126121+-o, situateil ar Mudwin Village and Gram Panchayat, Kadtal Mandal, Ranga Recldy District and pass appropriate orders within a period of fbur weeks lrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶32

Pending miscellaneous peritions, ifany, shall stand closed.

¶33

SD/-N,CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' ,-L SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To, 1. The District Coltector, Ranga Reddy District, Tetanqana State.

¶35

One CC to SRt. ZEESHAN noNnN rVnHvOoo. EJ"ocaie. 1oeuc1 3. Two CCs to AGP FOR REVENUE, High Court forthe Staii oi retanlan, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies \ 5. One Spare Copy TR LS \ V

HIGH COURT

DATED:1710212022

ORDER

-( tie s TA 14,
o)q
(-) 2 5 rEB 2022
',-+

¶40

WP.No.7131 ot 2022

¶41

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶42

M/s. Mahmood Builders Private Imited v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Mahmood Builders Private Imited v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sirikonda Hanumantha Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Narayana Rama Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana

Madhura Krishnarjuna Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Kandandi Jagjeevan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Kandandi Jagjeevan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Kandandi Jagjeevan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana