Disposed

Boya Shankaramma alias Gudise Anjanamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Feb 2022WP/5594/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner alleged police inaction. The Court observed that the FIR was registered against the accused, rendering no further orders necessary in the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

No orders required to be passed in the writ petition as the complaint had already been acted upon and a case registered.

Boya Shankaramma alias Gudise Anjanamma Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶2

THURSDAY,^{THE THIRDDAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^ANDTWENTYTWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶5

WRIT PETITI ON^{NO: 5594 0F} 22

¶6

Between:

¶7

BovaShankaramma@GudiseAnjanamma,W/o'Ke_shanna,Agedabout39yearsocc. iiiiirr-nr.li",'ny".erdiO-rn"^{uiitrge lilupunur tt/andal, Rayachur District Karnataka.}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana,^{Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department'} Secretariat Buildings,^Hyderabad

¶11

The Superintendent^{of Police,Jogulamba Gadwal District'}

¶12

The Divisional Superintendent^{of Police,Alampur, Jogulamba Gadwal Dist'}

¶13

The station House Officer,^{leeja Police station. Jogulamba Gadwal District.}

¶14

Kurva Kishtanna,^{S/o. D.Sunkanna, Aged about 45 years, Occ.Agriculture,} Thumkunta Mandal, Aija^{Mandal Jogulamba Gadwal District}

¶15

Kurva Kotiswar, S/o.Kurva^{Kishtanna, Aged about 25 years, Occ.Agriculture,} Thumkunta Mandal, Aija Mandal^{Jogulamba Gadwal District.}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition Under Article 226 of^{the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High courtmay be pleased} to issue a writ of Mandamus or^{any other appropriate writ, order or direction,} declaring the inaction of the^{respondents1 to 4 in registeringthe case againstthe} respondents No.5 and 6 even though the^{petitioner had lodged complaint before the} 4threspondent on 0410112022, as illegal, arbitrary,^{unjust and unconstitutiona I and} consequently direct the respondents^'1 to 4 to consider^{the complaint of the petitioner} dated 41112022 and take appropriate action against the^{Respondents No.5 and6.}

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶19

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the complaint of the petitioner dated 0410112022 and take appropriate action against the Respondents No.5 and 6 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main wnt petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.DILIP KUMAR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : AGP FOR HOME

¶22

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.S & 6 : NONE APPEARED

¶23

The Court made the following ORDER

¶24

I )

¶25

THE {ON.BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶26

WRIT P ON No.5594 of 2()22

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

This wr^{it petition,} under Article²²⁶ of^{the Constitution of}

¶29

India, is filed by the^{petitioner,seekingthe followingrelief :}

¶30

".. to lss E a Writ of Mandamus or any other^{approprtate writ,} order or lirection declaring^{the inaction of the respondents1 to} 4 in regi^:tering the case against^{the respondentNos.S and 6} even tho'gh the^{petitionerhad lodged complaintbeforethe 4th} responde tt on 04/01/2022 as^{illegal, arbitrarY,unJustand} unconstit ttional and^{consequentlYdirect the respondents 1 to 4} to consid'r the complaint^{of the petitioner dated 4/1/2022 and} take app opriate action against^{the Respondent Nos.5 and 6} and to^{pa :s} such other order^{or orders"}

¶31

( (

¶32

Heard.^)erused the^record.

¶33

The^{grie vance of the petitioner is that though she fileda} complaint, dat3d^{04.01.2022before the respondentNo'4-station} House Officer Aiza^{PoliceStation,Jogulamba Gadwal District'} against the^{u lofficial respondents,so far no action has been} taken against^hem.

¶34

The learred^{Assistant GovernmentPleaderfor Home'on} writteninstru.tions,wouldsubmitthatthesubjectcomplaint dated04.01.2)22wasactedUponandaPettyCaSeconscute No.2 of 2022^{'tf Aiza PoliceStation,Jogulamba GadwalDistrict'} was registerec^{for the ofFenceunder Section 323 rlw 34 of IPC} after obtaining^{necessarypermission from the Court concerned'}

¶35

In view^{lf the submissionmadeby the learned Assistant} Government^{P eader for Home that the aforesaid complainthas}

I I

been^{acted upon, no furtherordersare requiredto be passed in}

¶40

this writ Petition^'

¶41

6 With the above observation,^{the Writ Petition is disposed}

¶42

¶43

Miscellaneous petitions, if any,^pending in^{this writ}

¶44

petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

SD/-M.MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I V./

¶46

SECTION OFFICER

¶47

¶48

'l,ThePrincipalsecretary,HomeDepartment,secretariatBuildings,Stateof Telanoana. Hvderabad.

¶49

The S-uperintendent of^{Police, Jogulamba Gadwal District'}

¶50

fne Oilsionat Superintendent^{of Folice, Alampur, Jogulamba Gadwal District.}

¶51

fHe Station Housb Officer,^{leeja Police Station.Jogulamba Gadwal District.} Two CCs to GP FOR^{HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hvderabad. [OUT]

¶52

Ohe CC to Sri.Dilip^{Kumar, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶53

Two CD Copies o. One spare copy

SA BS

\VI

i.--

HIGH COURT

DATED:0310212022

ORDER

WP.No.5594^{of 2022}

,,:{1tru srA
,, k"
<br>1-
"f .<br>1E FEB 2022
)
*
1
_

¶62

DISPOSING^{OF THE\ J.P}

¶63

WITHOUT^COSTS.

Boya Shankaramma alias Gudise Anjanamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Boya Shankaramma alias Gudise Anjanamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Sultan and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Korra Ashok Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Gujjala Lakshmi Vs The Union of India and 4 Others

K. Lava Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. KeluthBasunda Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Fatima Begum Vs The State of Telangana