Dismissed

Madapathi Nagendrappa v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Feb 2022WP/5012/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by temple representatives seeking an injunction against illegal encroachment on temple property by state authorities, holding the petition liable for non-joinder of necessary revenue parties.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties (revenue authorities) without costs.

Madapathi Nagendrappa Vs State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE FIRST^{DAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶6

WRIT ETI to NO 501 o 20 2

¶7

'"T""1f,"*.'!lr's.:.illifry;fiii;,'#'[13Efi:'fiSfi;f,l"ffiff'r?j:;'?'i%:"?J'"Jl Veerdbhadra^Swam' ffiffi;i'H-R-D';iiici,^{tetangina- 50008e}

¶8

2 M Veerabhadra ad^{a path i, V''lylTJr swam} il;i,g U,;' USA,q: $^g:;,ff"ffi il] r?""$,iri"'3ll.iJ'^iJli il,r'"iiiii,'Ribi.trict,^{telan gb na -50008egb na -50008ena -50008e-50008e}

¶9

il,r'"iiiii,'Ribi.trict,^{telan gb na -50008egb na -50008ena -50008e-50008e}

¶10

' 'H,i'ffis-ffi tff,ixrr';*1111 *-: .1

¶11

-Uq'Hlit::[t+:i,"fuf,?"x:',e;f&'^f "?flLKL];"Geni]-canope'l

¶12

'[e+uut+$,tl#$]$'m,^**n"'""'il:'::;I&"s'#rijr

¶13

'v:s,r,Liqryiiiffi ?l:".'+'f'iofl/l"*:f,^{"li3r::3'?t"['i"i?ilil'3Jl} Mandal'^{RR Distnc}

¶14

z Mad^{apathi nn,rJ} fi ;il:*'mJlrttL o,g'3 "3.1,JiSL',^{8':";LTi U:'ll.}

¶15

/eerabhadra^{t*il:'+#;;5;;} -500089 lVlandal'^RRDistnt ^ -^ 'o "oorc^{occ-Pooiari of} "Ji ;i3'n;"'"1'rlt;';'3in'%:;a'0"

¶16

'H,lip";,'**ffi l;3}1r$$q-3ffi

¶17

'$i'"#"t'ilii={ii+1,#,'fr^{rimr;1tt*fr *ffi *r?!?'ni%"'"rir'l} l0Madapathi.sHi:ilxtJ5"+;['Jfr"t3:']ft^{il'd,.?fi :i?:4ru#"Yls8f';} 30/1 '^Mancntrevt

¶18

ffi::[["fi^]:[;*iit$1t.ll'^,s't"[':r:srili'-s:x'x'3:r

¶19

"uisHl'ii,il"ili,ffi^tx:iit'%ffi $J'lil:s::"::",,

¶20

AND

¶21

BIS:?gl;5pr,S,:r'"lJ:Ugli'83l,':[?3i1ft'f;"'*""#fl.ii8!"8i/"a9[bii'izz [B;51'T'%3'"";:f^v'

¶22

2 #r"",,l"-^{:**'""1+:*:gr:"ax?'s[H{:ft'91ft}

¶23

3 i!3tt"rttttge!Ti&\ffi

¶24

,reransanastatePori:eHeadquarters

¶25

4 g";,ui1l';*1,"ig"Ur:l[n"0"3[ln9lii3"1%'nh"J"t?Y'i'!ii'district' 500089

¶26

-'-

¶27

I /

¶28

Station House officer, Narsingi police station, Gandipet, Narsingi, Telangana 500075

¶29

...RESPONDENTS

¶30

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of a writ of mandamus to a)direct the Respondents, their authorities, agents, representatives, functionaries, ancillaries, porice etc, to cease their iregar and arbitrary actions; and injunct the Respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioners and taking iregar or coercive steps to dispossess the petitioners from the Schedure property bearing Sy.No.3g3, Machrrevula Vi age' Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District, Admeasuring Ac.32628Gts b)direct the Respondents to remove their arbitrary and iregar encroachment and to remove their e property bear ns ., -i District,AdmeasuringAc.326.28Gtsc)directtheR-< "1ll[:l;"]i,l],iilil,^{lll; ff ,H :Tj;i,".::;} ,ilJ:ff::: 0,.o."". a nd procedu re ".t,ori.r,"a ii:fl.:J"'::;1,ffi ff:

¶31

IAN o: 10F 2022

¶32

petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in ,T: T.H:i::1,'";'::f or the petition, ," High co,.t mav be preased to direct their temporary-encampments from the schedure property bearing ar.ro. ao'" Gandipet Mandar, District, Admeasurins; # #,J':T"l];1ff:' ^,n,."00, around the said Temple.

¶33

IANO:2 OF 2022

¶34

petition under Secl the affdavt r "o n .ffiii: r;#"x:,JH,;jn:;:Hil:::::::; the Respondents, their authorities, agents, r.urru.u-n, lljj]",'l;,lll':,:ff ':"^{the nature or nature} "?',ll'I.*i'jl iL'lllj. jl District, Admeasurins ^;^{#;ffll:il,,: IJf:;":,l} # ,""0",,' *"""*ooo,

¶35

Counsel for the petitioners:SRl. SARAMpALLy MRUDULA COUNSCI fOr thE RESPONdENT NO.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 5: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

¶36

-*--

¶37

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE^{SHAMEEMAKTHER}

¶38

WR IT PET TION o.501 20F2o22

¶39

ORDER:

¶40

This Writ Petltion,^{under Article 226 of the Constitutionof} india, is filed^{by the petitioners, wherein the following prayer is} made:

¶41

"... to issue a wrlt, order^{or direction,in the nature of a} writ of mandamus^to: ,j iir"a -' the^{Respondents,their authorities'..agents'} representatives,^{functionaries,ancillaries' police etc''} to'."ut" their^{iilegal and arbitrary actions; and injunct} ine n.tpona"nts^{lrom interferingwith the.possession} oilf'tu-pEtition"rs^{and takingillegalor coercive steps to} iitpott"tt^{the Petitionersirom the Schedule Property} U""ting Sy.No.393,^{Machirevulla Village'Gandipet} M;;J.i, Rangareddv^{District,Admeasuring Ac'326-28} GtS. Ol lilct^{the Respondentsto remove their arbitraryand} illeqal encroachment^{and toremov€ their} - -u rrt construction' etc '/ ft9' the "n'JJ.p"nit, i.t.ir.if.^{Property bearingSv No'393'Machirevulla} Vili"s", Gandipei^{Mandil, Rangareddv District'} Ad measuring^{Ac.326-2 SGts:} .l J"".i-ir',"^{iespondentsto act only as per. law'and} follow due^{processand procedureestablishedby law to} take any^{action against the Petitioners;} And^pass such^{other order or orders . "}

¶42

¶43

2 Heard the^{learned counsel for both sides and perusedthe}

¶44

record.

¶45

In the course^{of submissions,it is brought to the notice of this} court that^{there is a dispute in relation to the subject land' The} Government^{is contending that the subject land belongs to it'} Therefore,^{the revenue authorities are necessary parties to the writ} Petition.^{As seen from the cause title of the Writ Petition' the} revenue^{authoritiesare not madeas party respondentsto the Writ} Petition.

¶46

¶47

Since the revenue authorities are not^made as^party respondents to the Writ Petition, this Writ^{Petition is liable to be} dismissed for non-joinder of^{necessary parties.}

¶48

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, liberty^is granted to the petitioners to file a fresh Writ Petition by making the revenue authorities as^party respondents, in accordance with the proced u re established under law.

¶49

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition

¶50

shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶51

¶52

//TRUE COPY//

¶53

SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

+1,r./

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRl. SARAMPALLY MRUDULA, Advocate IOPUCI

¶58

lwoCCsto GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, High Courtforthe State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶59

Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶60

Two CD Copies.

¶61

One Spare Copy.

GB a.\ )- BS

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 10212022

ORDER

i $E STA
(
(
/qJo i\t. I
21Fil2r2?

¶68

WP.No.5012 ot 2022

¶69

DISIT,IISSING -THE WP

¶70

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶71

@ ilr-

Madapathi Nagendrappa v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madapathi Nagendrappa v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vallepu Nagarjuna Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

B.Seetha Rajan Vs The State of Telangana

N.Gopal Vs The State of Telangana

Basheed Shaik , S.K. Basheed Vs The State of Telangana

Atc Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Abdul Dastagir Vs The Government of Telangana