Petitioner sought writ against police interference in a civil dispute regarding land. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, leading the High Court to dismiss the writ petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OFMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDT. JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 5175OF 2017
Between:
R.Kala Bai, W/o.R.Balajee Agedabout 75 years, Occ: Household,Ryo'1-21' Puppalguda (V),Rajendianagarlr/andal, R.R.District, Cyberabad.
...PETTTIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheconstitutionof India praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High courtmay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction,more particularly, onein ihe nature of Writ of lvlandamus,declaringthe action of the Respondent Policein interfering in Civil Disputesand harassingthe Petitionerto settlethe claim of the Respondent Nos.7 and . Ifor a meager sumof Rs.5,00,0001in respect of the
Petitioner land admeasuringAc.0-10 Gts in sy.No.239 situated in Puppalguda virr,g"' RajendranagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District, Cyberabad, as illegal' aroitiary and violativ6of Articles14, 19,21 and 300-A of the Constitutionof lndia ,nJ .ont"qr"ntlydirect the Respondent Police not to threaten the Petitionerwith dire consequencLsand call them to the Pollce Stationfor the purposeof settling Civil Disputes.
PMP. NO:6 oF2 7
Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High courtmay be pleased to direct RespondentPolice not to interferein civil Disputes by calling the Petitioner tothe .Police Stationor otherwise, harass them by threateningthem with direct consequences,pendingthe main Writ Petition'
CounselforthePetitioner:SRIM.R.K.CHAKRAVARTHY(NotPresent)
counsel for theRespondentNos.1 to 5: SRI A.MANOJ KUMAR, AGP for HOME rep.GP FOR HOME
Counsel for theRespondentNos.6 to 8: None Appeared
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLEDT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITIONNO.s175OF 2017
ORDER:
Sri M.K.Chakravarthy,Iearned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatsometime back he gave no obiection to the petitioner.
3 Under thesecircumstances,this Writ Petitionis dismissed for default.
MiscellaneousPetitions pending, if any, shall stand closed'
No costs.
SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// & SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI tt/ R K CHAKRAVARTHY, Advocate IOPUC] 2 Two CCs to the GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 3 Two C. D. Copies. 4 One Spare Copy. IVRC
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210312022
*-.^-
:,tATA Q; \ ai<br>L<br>I.li'o L?qtt8
tB 5
",
ORDER
WP.No.5175 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
12
R.Kala Bai
The State of Telangana
SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
