The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 12769 of 2009 for default, noting the absence of a representation from the petitioners despite the matter being listed for orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA:AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICESHAMEEMAKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 12769 oF 2009
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of ltilandamus declaring the action ofthe 2nd respondentin not grantingthe pension from the date of their applications under SwtantraSainikSammanPension schmen 1980 sanctioned to thepetitionersinspite of the representation dated 15-07-2008 of thepetitioners, asillegal,arbitrary,in gross violationof the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14and 16 of the constitution of lndia and consequentlydirectthe respondents to sanctionthe pension to the petitioners from the date of theirApplication,includingthe arrears of the Pension and with all consequentialbenefitsor othenauisePetitionerswill suffer serious loss andgreat hardshiP.
WPMP. NO: 16530 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions to consider and dispose of the representation dated 15-07-2008 pending with the 2nd respondent within six Weeks pending disposal of the Writ Petitio n.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl CHALLA SIVASANKAR (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO, SRI VIJAYA BHASKAR MOOLA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION No.12759 oF 2009
ORDER:
In spite of the matter being listed today under the caption "for orders", there is no representation for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have no interest to pu rsue the matter.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed, There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTA REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI CHALLA STVASANKAR, Advocate tOpUCl 2. One CC to SRI PASALA PONNA RAO, Advocate IOPUCI' 3. One CC to SRI VIJAYA BHASKAR MOOLA, Advotate tOpUCl 4. Two C.D. Copies. 5. One Spare Copy. IVRC SW
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210312022
ORDER
WP.No.12769 of 2009
,\ '.tE I -ra TE
{
/,
k
oJo 0 t t'?l\ 2Ba
.t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT GOSTS
4q
a,Ll
{1
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sriram Narayana Rao and Others
The Government of India
V. Kavitha
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
