Allowed

Surgi Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Mar 2022WP/4355/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the Sub-Registrar to register sale and gift deeds and to quash a government memo. The court directed immediate registration without reference to the memo, subject to the outcome of pending Supreme Court proceedings, with directions on violation notices.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Sub-Registrar to register sale, transfer, and gift deeds without reference to the impugned Memo, with an endorsement stating registration is subject to the outcome of the pending Supreme

Surgi Anjaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE^{TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF I\4ARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{B. VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITIO^{N NO: 4355OF 2022}

¶6

Betwee n^:

¶7

Swamv.Aoed about⁴⁸ Ye^{a rs.} Occ. Busrness,^R/o. Surgi Anjaiah, S/o Choutuppal^Village and P6st,- Chor.rtuPPal^lr,4andal Yadadri Bhuva nagiri Districl.

¶8

PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Princrpal} .Secretary,^Stampsand Reoistration Depariment,^{Secretariat, Hyderabad}

¶11

riJ Corririioheiino^{lnspectorGeneial of Registration and Stamps5-3-} g55 i{zam Shahi Rd, Mozbmjahi tvlarket, Herza Estate Risala^Abdullah Colonv. Jam Baqh, Hvderabad,^{Telangana 500095'}

¶12

3 ir'," oi&iiii n"sisiiarior^{Regisirationind Stamps, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri} District.

¶13

+. if.re 5uO-negistrar,^{Choutuppa!YadadriBL'ruvanagiriDistrict'} S. Choutuppal^{6ram Panchayai, Rep. by its Panchayat Secreta} ry,^Choutuppal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri^District

¶14

,..RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article^{226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith, the High courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order^{or direction more particularly one in the nature of the} wRlT oF IvANDAIVUS^{declaringthe actionof the 4th respondentin refusingto} receive, register^{and release the sale deeds / gift settlementdeeds or any} documents^{presented by the petitioneron the namesof the persons rnterestedin} respect of the house^{plots in layoutover the land,inSy.Nos,,1 05lAl5, 105lAl4'} 1O5lAl5l1, 105lAl7^{and 105/A/9 situated at choutuppal Village and t\landal',} Yadadri Bhuvanagiri^{District,in view of the Memo No.G2125712019dated26,08.2020'} 29.12.2020 issued by^{the respondent No. 2as illegal,arbitrary' null and void and} consequently direct^{the 4th respondentto receive, register and releasethe sale} deeds /^gift settlement^{deedsor any documents presentedby the petitionerin} respect of the house^{plots in layout over the land in sy.Nos.'1051A15,1051A14,} 1o5lAl5/'1 , 1O5/Al7 and 1O5/A/9^{situatedat Choutuppal Village andl/landal,} Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District,

¶16

(Prayer is amended as per Court Order dated 23.O3.2022 in l.A.No.2 of 2022\

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to receive, register and release the sale deeds / gift settlement deeds or any documents presented by the petitioner in respect of the house plots in layout over the land in Sy.Nos.105/4/5, 1051A14, 105lAl5l1 , 105lAl7 and 105/4/9 situated at Choutuppal Village and Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, in view of the Memo No.GZl257l2019 dated 26.08.2020,29.12.2020 issued by the respondent No. 2 pending finalization of the Writ Petition

¶19

(Prayer is amended as per Court Order dated 23.03.2022 in l.A.No.2 ol 2022) Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. KANAKAIAH

¶20

Counsel for Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEB. VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶24

WRIT PETITI^{ON No.435 5 0F 2022}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Heard both sides^{and perusedthe material on recorri'}

¶27

'j ll is subnii''.ei^{lliti'lc icarneclcounsei on} 'liiler sicte :h::l^sJb:cci ,iriil-if r ..rr lhis -1\i:l'i 1".:tl'Lllln ls sil'.1:Ltrll'colci'cr1^{br illcCrln.irnoll()rilcr} :):rsi,- ''l^{D, ll'ls a.r!rl-i ir'W'P'NC32'q oi 20)2 ar'cli;i'rlt:hili:t.cl} l11.il2 lC2: .rs^{moC;irli br. iirt: ilrCe Iilart'ri22'i)2'2122'r' 'A NI':'ri} ./i)ll rr \r.:i.\o.29E:l^{,.i )'.)'2) :'Lrlci balcn' il's srlr:ilrirrs \'l'r'L 'r'r"ill';'';} n-lir\ I)e iltsposcrl^{lli lt-, illt-i.i.lsl-hcr''oi}

¶28

3 Tnere iort. ioilowir-:g^{i'i-re CommonOrcle rciatcci 18'C22C22rn} W"P.No.328of2022andbatchaSmodifiedbytheorderdated 22.02.2022 in^{I.A" No.2 of 2022 in W'P'No'2985ol 2022' in terms} thereof, this^{writ Petition is disposeclof as under without any order as} tO COSTS:

¶29

(i) The respondent^{-Sub-Registraris directed to register the} document of sale,^{transfer and giftetc} '^{presented lor} registration^{b1' the petitioner/s withoutreicrencesto the ,lemo} Nns o?/1.)7/2019 dated 26.0t.2C2C^{and 29 12 2020 issuedb1-} thr: rcsponclcttl^{rhc Clomn.iis-tiolrct':tnd Inspcctor Get-icral of} fi:^qrstr.Lirott llnrl Slilllltls 'l-ci:itlqlilllL: l'elter \o l5^{'llj \1C20I (l} .litLLr'^(] I^{I L .lr l"} r\Llr^rl lll' tllt: l asDOlraiLtrrt^- llltl llo:llrnissrotlr:r' \lLtrricii;lri (- rlfi'l'llll rlrNrzampc'. io^{illa r'(rsilorl(lail"Lltc Sriil iicglsir:ir"} (') rt I 1l b r't ll"i Il i.t I ' RartgiL Retlcl<sup>I)istrict. illl'j -llrlLl'tllL tlt ls ll it'r 'r"sLl(clllt tlril \ arlou -< l,lttt.ttt:i^{p:rl Clotnll.ri ssitltli'::si i.l tl^'c St:lI il'}

¶30

¶31

(ii) the Sub Registrars in the State shall make arr endorsemenr ar the reverse side of the first page of the document referred in direction No.(i) that registration so done is subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Government before the Hon,ble Supreme Court; and

¶32

(iii) in case, it is found that there is an-,", r.iolation of 1ar,., liks plols /^lands / structures being sold form p:rrt of F.T.L. ancl Bullcr Zone / Plots har,ir.rg less than 30 fect roarl u,idth acccss. thc S:rb R, :t\tr:tr sh.rll m;.kc ;r,r n t infornrin g ,'i c:iL.t trotrtnq r-1tc purchasers rh:rr'sk,.,,rll:::,^",'-" , c.ri', cd in purcltasc oI such plols: :jLicl.l tra n s:rct iot..l5j arc itjt b-t. rejcr.:Lnt slatLttorl.. prr;r.rstons: Lhtil registralion of lhc s:rmc is ,s1111i:1.1 to oLlicotne oj.or.c1r,rs ,tf iltc Hon'blc Supremr: corLrr in SLp lCnrii \o i(1b95 o1.r02r .i.o rh:rL cfli:cl. an cnclorscmcnl sl.rirll l;t, tnrdr. ,rn ,i,,_ ,.r.ar,, siclc o1. lltt. J:rsi sr.,J.ii p.rq, L,t tlrt (1, \ l.nlr,l ,.rr i .l_ t.t^,1,. cncumbr.:rrcc rocorci. 11cbsilc r ic

¶33

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed

¶34

There shall be no order as to costs_

¶35

//TRUE COPYtt^{ASSISTANaX:G|SrRAR} . Sd/. I. NAGA LAXMI

¶36

To, SECTION OFFIcER ] iie i;l;rs!i'?!:?l3i]i.,i5 #r',3nd Res istratio n De pa rtme nt, State or z. rne uommtssroner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, 5_3_ 953, Nizam Shahi Rd, rr,,tozimlirri M;;k;t" ;;)", Risala Abduilah ^^{cotonv,Jame;gh, ;yoeraoao. Terangana50009::trtu.} 3. The District Reoistrar District.^, .ror Registration and Stamps, yadadri Bhuvanagiri 4. The Sub-Reoistrar CheLrlgppal. yadadrl Bhuvanagirl Drstrict. , Jffi L?,,:i;^{rf,:,?,:ir",,, bh",t, pp, i6,.Z'# bi n.n" y. r c houtr-, ppa,yad} ad rr 9 9n"^{CCfo Sri J Kanakaiah} Advocate IOPUCI 6' IW3 33t3r35^{ror neuenull'iigh*"i;d"ro'/u-.eState or reransana} [oUr] 9. One Soare Coov MBC

HIGH COURT.

BVR,J

DATED: 2310312022

) r i.1! i:
rt
()
\01 APB 2t22 ;
.1.

¶42

ORDER

¶43

WP.No.4355^{of 2022}

¶44

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION}

¶45

WITHOUT^COSTS

Surgi Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surgi Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bezawada Nageswara Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Kalvakuntla Manjula Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Mamilla Saritha Vs The State of Telangana

B. Veeraswamy Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammad Jamal Vs The State of Telangana

Billa Shanker Vs The State of Telangana