Dismissed

Kalvakuntla Manjula v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Mar 2022WP/29706/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court disposed of the Writ Petition in terms of the common order passed in W.P. No. 329 of 2022 and related modifications, directing the Sub-Registrar to register pending documents with necessary cautionary endorsements regarding plot validity and Supreme Court stay rules.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the common order dated 18.02.2022 in W.P. No. 329 of 2022 as modified.

Kalvakuntla Manjula Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Ft ,l^z. <(Special^{OriginalJurisdiction)} @ESDA,,^{THE TWENTVSECoND DAY} oF MARCH -/ rworHousANDANDTWENTvrwo _/ PRESENT -- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 29706 0F 2021

¶4

Between:

¶5

Kalvakuntla Manjula, Wo Kalvakunfla Vinod Rao Aged about 65 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No.1-3-168, AN Reddy Colony, Shastrinagar, Nirmat, Nirmal District Rep by her GPA holder Rathod Ramu S/o Rathod Mothitat Aged about 45 years, Occ Busjness Rt/o H.No.1-13, Medampally, Khanapur, Nirmal District

¶6

Kalvakuntla Haritha, W/o K. Veerasimha Rao Aged about SO years, Occ Housewife, Ri/o Flat NO.73, V Btock, Kanthi Sikara Apartments, panjagutta, Hyderabad Rep by her GPA Holder Ankam Rajendhar S/o Rajanna Aged about 43 years, Occ Business R/o H.No.22-52, Shanthi Nagar, Khanapur, Nirmal District

¶7

...pETraoNERS

¶8

AND

¶9

The State of Telangana, Rep by its principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secreta riat, H yderabad

¶10

2.^;fhe lnspector General Stamps and Registration, Moazzam Jahi Market, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶11

Khanapur Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Khanapur, Nirmal District

¶12

The Sub Registrar, Khanapur, Nirmal District, Telangana State

¶13

¶14

l \

¶15

/t ...RESPoNDENTS Petition under Arricre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the Hlgh court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 not receiving, regrstering and releasing the documents in favour of the prospective purchasers produced by the petitioners, basing on the Memo issued by the

¶16

)

¶17

¶18

Respondent No.2 vide^{No.G2t257t2o1gdaled26tOBt2O20'and AmendedMemo} No.G2l257l2O19daled29t12l202o,fortheunapprovedplotsbealingNos.13,14, 15, 16, 17,18, 34,^{35, 38, 39, 41, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,51 to 81, 85 to 96'} ofPetitionerNo,linSy.No.306/al,andPetitionerNo'2irtSy.No.306/a2,both situated at Thimmapur^{Viltage, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District'T-S} '^{inspite of} order dated 23/0812021^{passed by thisHon'blecourt in wP.No.9248/2021 is} illegal, arbitrary and^{violation of articles 14, 21 and300-4 of constitution of lndia} also against the^{principles of natural justice and consequentlydirect the} Respondent No.4 to^{receive, register and releasethe Documentin favour of the} prospective purchasers^{produced by the Petitioner for the unapprovedplots} bearing Nos^{13.14, 15,16,17, 18. 34, 35, 38, 39' 41,42' 43' 44' 45' 46' 47' 48'} 51to81,85to96,ofPetitionerNo.1inSy.No,306/al,andPetitionerNo.2in Sy.No 306/a2, both^{situated at ThimmapurVillage, Khanapur Mandal'Nirmal} District, T.S.

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under Section^{151CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} direct the Respondent^{No.4 to receive, registerand releasethe Documentin} favour of the^{prospective purchasersproduced by the Petitioner for the} unapproved^plots bearing^{Nos.13, i+, 15, 16, 17,18' 34, 35, 38,39, 41' 42' 43'} 44,45,46,47,48,51-to81'85to96,ofPetitionerNo1inSyNo306/al'and PetitionerNo,2inSy.No.306/a2,bothsituatedatThimmapurVillage'Khanapur t,4andal, Nirmaf District,^T.S ,^{pending disposal of main Writ Petition '}

¶21

L--

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner^{:SRl.M A K MUKHEED'/'} -.,Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE} Counsel for the Respondent^{: N PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FOR MC TELANGANA)} The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

IIO\IOTJRABLE SRI .IUSl'ICE B. ,I.I,,\,SEN ItI-DD}, WRIT'PIITI ]'ION No .29706 oF 2021

¶27

RDER (oRAL)

¶28

Heard both sides and perused the material on recorul.

¶29

It is submitted by the learned counsel on either side that subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.p.No.32g of 2022 and batch dated 18.02.2022, as modified by the order dated22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022in W.p.No.2985 of 2022 and batch, and therefore, keeping the matter pending will not serve any purpose, as such, the same may be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶30

This Court passed interim order in this writ petition directing the respondents to receive, process, register and release the subject docur.nenti s. However, conditions were imposed that (a) the petitioner,s is,,arc_ rrol permitted to rvithdraw the writ petition and (h) registration shall be suh.jcct lo firral result of the writ peliliou,

¶31

ln view of the above, recording the atbresaid submission ol. the leamed counsel on either side, lollowing the conrrnon orcler clated 18.02.2022 in W.P. No.32U of 2022 an<l batch, as rnodified by the oxler dated 22.02-2022 in r.A. No.2 of 2022 it w.p.No.2985 of 2022, in ternrs thereof, this writ petition is disposed of as under, without any order as to costs:

¶32

(A) If the subject document/s has/have already been registered and

¶33

released pursuant to the interim order;

¶34

(i) the documen{: 1e11"*a by the Sub_Regisrrar shall be subjecr ro outcome of SLp (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Govemment before the Hon'ble Supreme Coun; and

¶35

1 \

¶36

(ii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plotsflands/structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer ZonelPlots having less than 30 feet road width access. the Sub

¶37

¶38

Registrar^{sl.rall make an endorsemel'tt inlbnning/cautionillgthe} -i"".,ived in purtha^te- oi suclt plotsl such nurchasers^trl"t 'itf,lt iransactions^{."t,ii uy relevant Statutory. provisions:that regiStration} of the^{same l'} "ilj#^{;; ;';;t"} of oidirs^{of the Hon'bleSupreme} court in^{tro'il"Jiii li"'isiss of 2o2t' ro that effect'an} endorsement 'h"ltil;^t";;;;** "n"umb'un"" record'^{website etc'}

¶39

(B) If the^{subj ect document/s is/are not yet registeredandreleased} pursuant^{to the interim order;}

¶40

(i) the respondent^{- Sub-Registrar is directed to register the} document^{of tuitli'un'r"'and gift etc'''presentedfor registration by} the petitioner/s"wtffi;;"f;;;;^{to the Merno Nos G2l257l2019} rlated^26'0s'202t " ;;' ;;''';;o;o'.t*-"{ bv the resPondent-the commissioner^{l;J;p;;i";e"neralof Registration andStamps'} retanganar^{t.;# ;'"0;;i;''N'vc'zots a.a5a 9t 1t 10'e ]::l'-d} by tte^{rcsponii-il"-cornrnissioner'Municipal Corporatton'} Nizampet^{t" th:X;;;"'li-1r," s't} :sl:11^"^{Quthbullapur' Ranga} Rcddv^{District]u,,j.,i,,-'lto'letters, if arry. issued by the vartous} N4uniiipal^{Commissioncrs in theState;}

¶41

(ii) the Sub^{l(eBistrars in the Sta-te. shall mnkc an cndorscment at} in directio.^thc o1'SLP^(civil) r*ersc^side "it;n;''i;ti^{il"of thc'docu,rent} 'et'ened No.(i)^{rhat ,"iii"'t'i a?^e.]s sulccr} ll.outcorre \o l 9695^{o1202If iletl bl theState Gt)'crrlrr'rentbeiirrc thc [lon'ble} S uPrct])e^{Courti atrd}

¶42

liii)^{in case' it is tbuntltliatthorc is any r'itrlation of lau likc plots} "^' ton.l' i 't'u.,t'l''J'';:i;;ii^{il'p^",uip r'r-' and Bul'ter Zonc} Plots having^{i"" tft""iO feet roal width access' the Sub Registrar} sliall^{make * #;;;i} informing.^{/ cautioning the purchasers} that risk^{i' i"'J"il; i;;;;tno" or} 'ua-. prots; such^{transactionsare} r,rtuv..r",-i#ti'i"''in'*:?:ff ',111{i3t[;:#J::1111-1ii iB:fiii,"":$;;^"i)dii'^{r" *'at errect' an endorsement shanbe} tu"'"rit'"^{first / stcondpage of the document} *ua" o"^m" *d ul'o^{in the encumbrancerecord' website etc'} ""J""^"

¶43

Asasequelthereto,miscellaneouspetitions'ifany'pendinginthis

¶44

writ oetiti^{on stand closed.}

¶45

//TRUE^COPY//

¶46

*3",Jill'iHltl3,?'^"1 srhrK-orrrcrn I

To,

/ /

The Principal Secretary Revenue Department State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶51

The lnspector General Stamps and Registration, Moazzam Jahi^Market, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶52

Commissioner Khanapur Municipality,^{Commissioner, Khanapur,Nirmal} District

¶53

The Sub Regrstrar,^{Khanapur,Nirmal District, Telangana State}

¶54

One CC to SRl. M A^{K MUKHEED,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶55

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High^{Court for the State of Telangana'} tourl

¶56

One CC to SRl. N PRAVEEN^{KUMAR(SC FOR MC TELANGANA),Advocate} loPUcl

¶57

Two CD Copies

¶58

One Spare Copy.

-::-:-::-..:

L-

t \

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2210312022

e SI.AT€
1r"
t
-)o 2t ruB ?s[
U
-l

¶67

ORDER

¶68

WP.No.29706 of 2021

¶69

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTON

¶70

WITHOUT COSTS

Kalvakuntla Manjula v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalvakuntla Manjula v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chakote Anuradha Vs The State of Telangana

Kum. G.Divya Tejaswi Vs State of Telangana

S. Jaipal Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Medha Infra Vs The State of Telangana

Jahangir Begum Vs State of Telangana

Vasireddy Rajendra Babu Vs State of Telangana