The High Court of Telangana permitted the petitioner to withdraw her writ petition challenging the allotment of a new designation and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 3925 OF 2022
Between:
Shravanthi Dubba, D/o Dharmara.ju, Age. 28years, Occ.Forest Beat Officer, Rio. H. No. 13-56i8, Ekkela, Eturunagaram, Mulugu- 506165.Designation. Forest Beat Officer(Local Cadre) Erstwhile Local cadre.Warangal,Allotted- New Local Cadre,-lVlahabubabad, Dt.2011212021Appeal Date. 2411212021
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of WRIT OF TMANDAMUS declaringthe allotmentof new local cadre made by the 2nd Respondentpursuant tovide G.O.Ms.No.3l7GAD dated OOt12l2O21 issued by Government ofTelanganaby not considering the Agency Area Scheduled Trrbe Certificate asper theG.O.Ms.No.24,dated. 1210612018 and allotted to new Non-Agency Districts vide Proc No. EF/EF/WA/IVBBD/FOBE/0228 as highlyillegal, arbitrary,unreasonable, disCriminatory and violative ofprinciples of naturaljustice and also in violationof Art 14 16(4), 21 and thepara(5) (1) of the V Scheduledof the Constitution of lndia and consequently to direct therespondents to retainthe petitionerin Agency Area where she is working as theyhave been selected underAgency Area ST Certificate asper G.O.lVIs.No.24,dated.1210612018.
IA NO: 1 0F 2022
Petition under section 151CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court maybe pleased to direct the Respondents toretain the petitioner in Agency Area where sheis working as she has beenselected under Agency Area ST Certificate as per G.O.Ms.No.24, dated.12tOOl2O18bypassingorders on theAppeal dt 24112t2021 madeby the petitioner to the respondents, pendingdisposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRIRAMESH CHILLA Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSENREDDY
WI{IT PI'1'ITIoN No.3925 Ol;2022
OIIDEIT:
Learned counsel forthe petitionerseeks permission of this
coul1 to withdrawthe writ petitiotl.
No costs.
Pending miscellaneouspetitions,ifany,shall stand closed'
SD/-K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
,TRUECOPY//
c4rJ
SECTIONOFFICER
to'', . on" 99 tq Sls?Iesh Chilla' Advocate-[oPU?,u," , i;; 6cti"cp for Forests'High Court for the s at HYderabad [OUT]
or r",unnunu
Sn.r
I]S
L\-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0110412022
ORDER
't t{E SIA; N.
I
0 7 Alri muz
oo)q
*.,.
WP.No.3925 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
6
V
1
N r
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shravanthi Dubba
State of Telangana
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
