The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous because it no longer survived upon the further developments of the case. The proceeding was closed without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRSI DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NO: 39105 OF 2014
Between:
Kakatiya Service Station,, Rep. by its Managing Partner R.Krishna tvlurthy, S/o. Late Muttaiah Aged about 52 years, R:/o.H.No.3-1 1-61/1 , Reddy Colony, Hanamakonda Warangal District.
...PETITIONER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions declaring the action of the respondents I and 2 in denying the supply of petroleum products to the petitioner in pursuance to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 12.4.2004 as illegal and to issue a consequential direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the supply of petroleum products in pursuance to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 12.4.2004, till the determination of the same and dispossession of the petitioner from the premises bearing No.1-8-627 in Sy.No.1053, near Ambedkar Statue, Main Road, Hanamakonda, Warangal by due process of law.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP. N O: 49019 OF 20141
Petition Under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the supply of petroleum products in
pursuance to the Memorandum of Agreement dated 12.4.2004, till the determination of the same and dispossession of thepetitioner from thepremises bearing No.1-8-627 in Sy.No.1053, near Ambedkar Statue, Main Road, Hanamakonda, Warangal by due process of law,pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.VEDULA SRINIVAS
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI.AADESH VARMA
The Court made the following ORDER
\
HONOURABLE DRJUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION No.39105 OF 2014
ORDER:
Learncd counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter would nor
survive and become infrucruous.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismisscd as infructuous. There shall
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 One CC to SRI.VEDULASRINIVAS,Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRI.DEEPAKBHATTACHARJEE,Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to SRI.AADESHVARMA,Advocate [OPUC] 4( Two CD Copies One spare copy S A PS
q
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2110612022
ORDER
--::=:-:<br>I
F'''.2 -.i4o'
)
t
^,s" r
c
o *> t...
'"L
t I
$
-l;il,u
-=:: g
WP.No.39105 of 2014
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. (-q.{" &, --4'-r4(22-
Kakatiya Service Station
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
