Dismissed

Sri Kalika Devi Sand and Morram Quarry Labour Contract Coop. Society Ltd. and another v. The State of Telangana and 10 others

Telangana HC20 Jun 2022WP/23149/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition challenged inaction by authorities regarding an appeal against a PESA Gram Sabha resolution approving a sand mining license. The court dismissed the writ, directing the appellate authority to dispose of the underlying appeal within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within two weeks. Writ dismissed. No order as to costs.

Sri Kalika Devi Sand and Morram Quarry Labour… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

.11

¶3

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA O'} ""O'*O'O$I

¶4

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

¶6

MONDAY,THE^{TWENTIETHDAY OF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶7

$-it

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE^{DR, JUSTICE G.RADHARANI}

¶10

WRIT PETIT N NO: 23149 OF 2022

¶11

Between:

¶12

1 Sri Kalika Devi Sand^{and Morram Quarry Labour contract-coop. societyLtd} -Nt.612r, Rajupeta .(foJl,lt) village' Mangapet .Mandal'

¶13

"'"i'"livlrrdr " oiii i"i,-flep. in" i 'neg^{oy its presi'oent k xati(a, D/o} -Gangaiatr'^Aged27 v"i[]^{ny".-iriupetd(roituru)village, Mangapet Mandal, Mulugu District}

¶14

2 Kurusum Kalika,^{D/o. Gangaiah, Aged 27,years,FUo H No'4-50'Rajupeta} (kotthur) village Mangapet^{mandal, Mulugu District}

¶15

...PETITIONERS

¶16

AND

¶17

The State of^{Telangana, Rep. by. its.secretary Tribal Welfare Department} DSS Bhavan, near-Masab^{tank,Hyderabad}

¶18

2.TheCommissioner,TelanganaStateTribalWelfareDepartment'DSS Bhavan, near Masab^{tank'Hyderabad}

¶19

3.TheDistrictcollector,andAgenttotheGovernmentMuluguDistrict,Mulugu

¶20

4.ProjectOffice,andAddl.AgenttotheGovernment,ITDA,Eturunagaram' Mulugu District

¶21

District Panchayat^{Officer, Mulugu District'Mulugu}

¶22

Mandal Parishad^{Development Officer, Mangapet mandal' Mulugu District}

¶23

Raiupeta Grampanchayat,^{Rep. by its Secretary, Ra.lupeta' Mangapeta} mandal, Muluqu District

¶24

PESA Gramsabha,,^{Rep.by its Secretary, Rajupeta (Kothur)' Rajupeta Gram} panchayth. l,4angapet mandal,^{t'4uluguDistrict}

¶25

The District Cooperative^{Officer Cum Registrar,,TelganganaCooperative} Societies, Mulugu^{District, lvlulugu}

¶26

l0.Assistant Director,,^{Miningand Geologist,Minesand Minerals Department,} Mulugu District, Mulugu

¶27

1 1. Sri Kalika Devi^{Tribal sandand MorramQuarry Labour contractMutually} ' ' Ailil6";aiativJSoiietv Lt, Raiupeta (Devahsaram), Mang-apellrnanda.l , "'RESPoNDENTS

¶28

ivrrri,g, Di"tli.t, nep.-ov^iit chairman

¶29

Petition under Article^{226 ol lhe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High court maybe}

¶30

¶31

¶32

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more^{particularly,one in the nature of} writ of mandamus, declaring the^{action of the 02nd respondent in not acting upon} the appeal filed by the^{petitioners and other villagers under Rule 09 of Telangana} PESA Rules, 2011, challenging^{the fraudulently conductedPESAgramsabha and} wrongfully recorded resolution^{dt.0411212021permittingthe 1oth respondent} socieiy for sand mining in^{the Godavari River under the purview of Raiupeta} village and the actron oi the other^{respondentsin proceedingto grantperniission} for the same to the 11th respondent^{society basedon the impugned resolution as} illegal, unconstitution a I and against the^{principles of naturaljusticeand} consequently direct the^{o2nd respondentto expeditiouslyact upon and dispose} the appeal dI.13112t2021^{filedbefore him, challengingthe impugnedresolution} dl.O4l12l2o21^passed on the^name of^{PESA gramsabha of Rajupeta village'} Mangapet mandal. before^{proceeding with the grantof licensefor mining of sand} in Godavari River under the^purview of^{Rajupeta village, Mangapeta mandal,} It4ulugu District.

¶33

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶34

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High court may be pleased to direct} the respondent authorities^{not to act upon the impugned resolutiond1.0411212021} passed on the name of PESA gramsabha of Rajupeta^{village,Mangapetamandal,} Mulugu District for^granting of^{license to the 1 1th respondentsociety for sand} mining in Godavari river in the^{purviewof Ra1upetavillage, Mangapeta mandal.}

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. CH^{RAVI KUMAR}

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent^{No's. 1 &2: GP FORSOCIAL WELFARE}

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent No.3:^{GP FOR REVENUE}

¶38

Counsel for the Respondent^{No's. 4 to 6: GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ}

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent No's. 7 to 9:^{SRI M'RAMGOPAL RAO (SC FOR} GRAM PANCHAYAT)

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent No's.'10 : GP^{FOR MINES}

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶42

¶43

(

¶44

HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶45

WRIT PETITION No.231,19 OF 2022

¶46

ORDER:

¶47

Learned counsel for the pcritioners submittcd that thc cause of action

¶48

would not survive and requested to gave a diection to the appellate authoriry to dispose of the appeal within a fixed time period.

¶49

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed with a direction to the appellate

¶50

authority to dispose of the appeal within a period of two weeks. There shall be no order as to c()sts

¶51

"lisccllan cotr s peudons, if anv, pcnding shall stancl c)osccl

¶52

SDIK.ONESIM DEPUTY REGISTRAR

To,

C_x,

,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

One CC to SRl.^{CH.RAVI KUMAR Alvgqate.IQP^UCI}

¶59

rwoCCs to^{GP FoR so'ilxi'WELieni,Hibr'')cou'rt ror the State of}

¶60

.. Tfil8B8!?;t?"'lo*^{REVENUE,Hishcourtfor the State of relangana'} TOUTI

¶61

+. iir"o'dc. to cP^{FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ,High courtfor the state of} Telanqana. [OUT]

¶62

Telanqana. [OUT]

¶63

1. o;'id 6^{'Snr rirr.nar',rGoPALRAo (Sc FoR GRAM PANCHAYAT)'} 6. Advocate ci;;eci IOPUCIto^{-ci ron MtNES,High court for the state of Telangana.[ouTl}

¶64

Two CD^CoPies.

B. One Spare^CoPY.

GB GJP -'>,-

,-i'i # ,4:-' iA'

HIGH COURT DATED:2010612022

¶69

ORDER

¶70

WP.No.23149^{of 2022}

¶71

r 1 c S I I 6
(o
+
o
(J 11 JtlL 2s2 a
te

/.2
[\ l,l\T l

¶72

DISMISSING^{THE WP} WITHOUT^COSTS. s*

Sri Kalika Devi Sand and Morram Quarry Labour Contract Coop. Society Ltd. and another v. The State of Telangana and 10 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Kalika Devi Sand and Morram Quarry Labour Contract Coop. Society Ltd. and another v. The State of Telangana and 10 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Leburu Ashok, And Another Vs The Union of India, And 2 others

M/s. Almelo Private Limited Vs Union of India

M/s Rsr Infra - Gsrcc (Jv) Vs the Union of India and 3 others

Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology Society Vs The State of Telangana

Kolli Bhava Sai Vaishnavi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s New Karimnagar Stone Crusher Vs The State of Telangana