Disposed

Vinnakota Sriprakash v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Mar 2022WP/33625/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 33625 of 2021 and I.A. No. 1 of 2021 in accordance with a common order in a related batch. The petitioner was directed to have sale deeds registered without reference to specific ignoramus memos, subject to the outcome of a pending Supreme Court stay petition, with a mandatory cautionary endorsement regarding potential legal violations.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to have sale deeds registered ignoring specific memos, subject to outcome of SLP No. 19695 of 2021, with cautionary endorsement on the document.

Vinnakota Sriprakash Vs State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

13183 I

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FORTHESTATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAI)

¶3

(SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)} WEDNESD;?.THE^{SI"XTEENTHDAYOF MARCH} -- TWO TIIOUSAI-D nr'\D TWENTY TWO " PRESENT

¶4

.IFIE, I IO\OU I{--\BLIi SRI .II. STICE^B .VIJAYS E N REDDY \'RI'I' PE'T Iil()\ \O: 3362 5^{()F 202} 1

¶5

Between:

¶6

l. Vinnakota^{Sriprakash' S/o BhaskarRao' Occ-. Business'RJo FlatNo l0l' MIG-324'}

¶7

( Dasari^{VenkataPtd;;ti'"i";1"t"' ["'aNo +'--kpHe colony'Kukatpallv'} HYderabad-500072 '

¶8

t - - 2.^{Neerudi -ttaanal'Shekar, S/o Pandu'.Occ- Private Employee'fuo Khazipallyvillage'Jinnaram} Sanga^{ReddYDistrict'}

¶9

, 7 Neerudi SatYanarayana'^{S/o Lingaiah' Occ- Agriculture'R-/o Khazipallyvillage'}

¶10

Jiuru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Distrtct'

¶11

1. Neerudi^{Balamani,w/o Narsimha'Occ- Agriculture' R'/o Khazipally village'}

¶12

i;;; Mandal'^{Sanga ReddY District'}

¶13

...PETITIONER(S)

¶14

,-\l)

¶15

I - State of^{Telangana'Rcp'bvits Principal Secretary'Revenue(Stamps and} s"retariai'^{l I} i^derabad'

¶16

Z ffi;;,tili 6liuin"n'

¶17

¶18

1. The^{Commissioner and Inspector General of RegistrationandStamps' Telangana'} Hyderabad.

¶19

The Joi,t^{Sub- Registrar,Sanga Reddy (R'O),SangaReddy District', (Erstwhile} Medak^Dislric0

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition^{under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in ,r-l.} "ina."l,'rr"a^{tt...*itt-I, the Hieh couitmay be pleasedto} issue any^{writ, order} "'^{dl;t;t;;; to"} the^{putti""turly '3rd Respondent one" in in the refusing nature to of writ entertainof} Mandamus^{declaring tr"o"iio' 'of} rep.istrations^{in respectof Pr"r:;'it'tf,r"'r'o;:ot'tnu'uelykanhikNatureSpace'adlneasuring} ,oln.t.,.,r^{otAc.3- 0r 1,2;;,,,;.';ii}.Ji" Vx"':ji'n'r|'lii'zoo'r'34ztE'257rAl'- zssrE:'^{zsslr'+'zsslvu' 2sstqqt'zsetBE2'} 2s7tAA.258/A,2s8/AA. 2591r,il3,2591EE4,^zoo'o 'zs"#l:'z;8';z'^{jitr'zuyi J[Lu'ipuilv Villaee' jinnaram Mandal'Sanga} Reddv District^{(Erstwhile litatft- nltttitti on tnt 6:tit oi l'i"rno issued by the 2nd} Resoondent^{in Memo N" ;#5i;;;s'-iuttazoloslzozo us illegal'arbitrarv and in} 202 I' dated^{23lu2o1lan'd consequentlv} violation of^{orderspassed i;wP N" 'si+;i"r} direct the^{3rd Respondenti: ;ceiv;' ttgi"t' a ieleasethe sale deeds pertainingto} Nuiuit sput"'^{udmeasurincto an extent of Ac'3-02'} Plots r/2 suntas, in^{the Layout situated} 'u"ry'i'u"rlit^{i, siN;';;)il;t'"26otE'^;;)i;"'"zii'i'2s7tAA' 2sstA'(} srv''^{zig net'2se tEE2'2se t EE3''} 2s 8/IA.^{2 s 8/E,I . 2sB t E2., i8H' ;;;;;;}

¶22

"2!

¶23

2591EE4,2601A and 2631A2 of Khazipally Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District (Erstwhite Medak District) notwithstanding the Memo issued by the 2nd Respondent

¶24

IA NO: I OF 2021

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to receive, register and release sale deeds of the petitioners in respect of Plots in the Layout namely Karthik Nature Space, admeasuring to an extent of Ac.302 l12 guntas, siiuated in dy.Nos.22fle,^plD. 26ot]. 3421E. 2571A.2571AA,2581A,' 258lAA, 258lBl, 258182, 2581E3, 258184, 258/Vu, 2591FF.1 , 2591EE2, 25918E3,' 2591884, 2601A and 2631A2 of Khazipally Village. Jinnaram Mandal. Sanga Reddy District (Erstwhile Medak District) on the basis of Memo issued by the 2nd Respondent in Memo No. G2125712019, dated 2610812020, without reference to Memo No.G2l257l20l9 issued by the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SRICHAR{N TELAPIIOLL

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION^.-

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER --

¶29

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAVSEN REDDY ., WRI'I PETITION No. 33625 0F 2021 '"/

¶30

ORDER (ORAL):

¶31

Heard both sides and perused the material on record.

¶32

It is submitted by the leamed counsel on either side that subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the cornmon order passed by this Court in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch dated 18.02.2022, as modified by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022 and batch, and therefore, keeping the matter pending will not serve any purpose, as such, the sarre rray be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶33

This Couft passed interim order in this writ petition directing the respondents to receive, process, register and release the subject document/s. However, conditions were imposed that (a) the petitioner/s is/are not perrnitted to withdraw the writ petition and (b) registration shall be subject to final result of the writ petition.

¶34

In view of the above, recording the aforesaid submission of the leamed counsel on either side, following the common order dated 18.02.2022 in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch, as rnodifled by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022, in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of as under, without any order as to costs:

¶35

(A) If the subject docurnenVs has/have already been registered and released pursuant to the interirn order;

¶36

(i) the documentis registered by the Sub-Registrar shall be subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Government before the Hon'ble Supreme Court; and

¶37

(ii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plots/lands/structures being sold form part of F.T.L, and Buffer ZoneiPlots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement inform ing/cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plots; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the

¶38

Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.1 9695 of 2021 . To that effect, an endorsement shall be made in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶39

(B) If the subject document/s is/are not yet registered and released pursuant to the interim order;

¶40

(i) the respondent - Sub-Registrar is directed to register the document of sale, transfer and gift etc., presented for registration by the petitioner/s without reference to the N4emo Nos.G2125712019 dated 26.08.2020 and 29.j2.2020 issued by the respondent-the Commissioner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana; Letter No.45/TP/NMC/2019 dated 01 .11.2019 issued by the respondent-the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Nizampet to the respondent-the Sub Registrar, euthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District, and similar letters, if any, issued by the various Municipal Commissioners in the State;

¶41

(ii) the Sub Registrars in the State shall make an endorsement at the reverse side of the first page of the document referred in direction No.(i) that registration so done is subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 fited by the State Government before the Hon'ble Supreme Court; and

¶42

(iii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plots/lands/structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer ZonelPlots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement inform ing/cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plols; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civit) No.19695 of 2021. To that effect, an endorsement shall be made on the reverse side of the firsVsecond page of the document and also in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶43

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,, pending in this writ

¶44

petilion stand closed

¶45

SD/.L.LAKSHMI^BABU ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TII.UE COPY//

SECI'tON OFF'ICEIt

To,

I The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, ' State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶51

Z The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶52

I	TheJoint^{Sub- Registrar,Sanga Redd-v(R'O)'SangaReddyDistrict'(Erstwhile} MedakDistrict)
4 25.	onCCtoSRi.^{SRICHARANTELAPRoLUAdvocate[oPUC]} TwoCCstoGPFOR STAMPS^{AND REGISTRATION'HighCourt fortheStateof} Telangana.IOUT]
,6.	Two^CDCoPies

LAK

I )

HIGH COURT T

BVRJ

1 t JUt{
1'

DATED:1610312022

ORDER

(

WP.No.33625 of 2021

WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COSTS

Vinnakota Sriprakash v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinnakota Sriprakash v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandu Delli Babu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Madhamshetti Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Hussain Vs The State of Telangana

Konduru Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Riyaz Vs State of Telangana

Konda Himakar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana