Allowed

Madhamshetti Srinivas v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Mar 2022WP/3089/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the refusal to register sale deeds. Relying on a common order in concurrent petitions, the court directed the Sub-Registrar to register documents notwithstanding specific government letters, subject to pending Supreme Court proceedings and a mandatory caveat about F.T.L. violations.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent Sub-Registrar to register the sale deeds subject to outcome of SLP No.19695 of 2021, with mandatory endorsements cautioning about potential statutory violations.

Madhamshetti Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY^{OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO : 3089^{OF 2022}

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

Ivladhamshetti Srinivas,^s/o Ramaiah, Aged about 60^{years, Occ. Agriculture,} R/o. H.No. 5-'168, Kuda Kuda Revenue village,^{Chivemmela lvlandal,} Suryapet District.

¶8

2 Madhamshetti Satyanarayana,^{S/o.Narayana,Aged about 55 y} ears, occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 5'2151A,^{Kuda KudaRevenuevillage'C} hivem mela Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶9

Bandiyala Venkata^{Reddy, S/o. Somi Reddy, Aged.about 57.years,Occ'} Agricr-ilture, R/o. C-23, Pa-gidipally^{village, Marripeda Mandal, Chinnaguduru,} Warangal District.

¶10

...PETlflONER(S)

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,^{rep. By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,} (Stamps and Registration) Secietariat Buildings,^Hyderabad.

¶13

The Commissioner and^{lnspector, General of Stampsand Registration, State} of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Sub-Registrar,, Suryapet,^{SuryapetDistrict.}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of^{the Constitutronof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction^particularly one^{in the natureof} ir,4andamus declaring the action of^{the respondents particularly 3'o respondent} herein in not receiving,^{registeringand releasingthe sale deeds in respect of} lands in Sy.No.25/1/1^{to an extentof Ac.0-06gts and in sy.No.25Al1 to} 9l-extent of Ac. 1-00^gt total^{ad-measuringAc. 1-06 gts, the land in Sy.No.26All1l1121o an} extent of ecIO-Zg^{gts, land in Sy.No. 25lGhato an extent of Ac. 0-07 gts and in} Sy.No.2SGha^{to an extent ot Rc. O-OZgts, total to an extent of Ac 0-14gts' all} Ggether total land^{ad-measuring Ac.2-09 gts (1 to 37 plots) situated at Kuda Kuda} iJu"nr" village of^{Chivvemla-Mandal of SuryapetDistrict belonging to the} p"tittn"r. he[in as illegal,^{arbitrary,unreasonable,violation of Principles of} irlatural Justice and^{violationof Articl-es 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of} lndia and consequently^{directthe respondentsto receive, register and release the} iai" 0""0, in^{respect of lands in Sy.No.2511t11o an extent of Ac. 0-06 gts andin}

¶17

Sv.No.^{25Al1to an extentof Ac. 1-00 gt total ad-measuringAc. 1.06 gts, the land} #ir.rl"l'idntrrnrc,n'"*i"nttr[c'^{o-zs gts' land in svNo2slGha to an} .-,""1, l,i n"^{O_Oi gt" ,nO'in-6'V.rrfo.iSOnuto ariextentof Ac. 0-07 gts, total to an} extent of^{Ac. 0-14 gts,arr togeli\eilotattano ad-measuring of Ac. 2-09 gts^(',1 to 37} plots) situated at Kuda xldlr'n"r..r"^{villageof chivvemlaMandal of Suryapet} bi.tritt u"tonging^{to the petitioners herein'}

¶18

lA NO: 1^{oF 2022}

¶19

Petition under^{Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} ih" Hign^{Court mav be pleasedto} the affidavit^{filed in suppJi} "i^{in" *[l;l} direct the^respondents, - pu'ti"ut"'iy 3rd respondent herein to direct the respondents^{to receive,,"glt"ilno ielease the sale deedsin respectof lands in} Sv.No. 2511/1^{to an extentlin.lo-oo-si.and in Sy-No. 25At1lo an extentof Ac'} ilAii ;iii"i ui-."r.r'ing^{nc. r-oo} !!?.:n".land^{in sv'No 26A1/1t1t2to an} extent of^{Ac. 0-29 gts. taniin SV Uo istcln^ to an extent of Ac 0-07 gts and in} Sv.No.2SGha^to "n "*tent-oi^{A" o-OZ gts' total to an extent of Ac 0-14gts' all} i"';1,1i"?[il1 ;";^{;;;;;'ingoJ A'} 9t'^^{(1 to 37 Prots) situated at Kuda} Kuda Revenue^{village ot 6ni"""'"f" ft'f'ndal} '-oP^{oi Suryapet District belongingto the} petitioners herein.

¶20

Counsel^{for the Petitioners: SRI M' KIRAN REDDY}

¶21

Counsel^{for the Respondents:GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION}

¶22

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶23

¶24

¶25

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶26

WRI T PET ITION N o.3089 OF 2022

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Heard both sides and perused the material on record.

¶29

k is submitted by the leamed counsel on either side that subject matter of this Wiit Petition is squarely covered by the Common Order passed by this Court in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch dated l8.O2.ZO22,as modified by the Order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.p.No.2985 of 2022 and batch, as such, this Writ petition r.nay be disposed of ir.r tenns thereof.

¶30

S Therefore, fo orving the common order dated rg.02.2022 in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and barch as modified by the Order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A. No.2 of 2022 in W.p.No.29g5 of 2022, in terms thereof, this Writ petition is disposed ofas under without any order as to costs:

¶31

(i) The respondent - Sub-Registrar is directed to register the document of sale, transfer and gift etc., presented for registration by the petitioner/s wilhout references to the Memo Nos.G2l2\l l2O19 dated 26.08.2020 and 29j22020 issued by the respondent the Commissioner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana; Letter No.45/Tp/NMC/2019 dated 01.11.2019 issued by the respondent - the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Nizampet to the respondent - the Sub Registrar, euthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District, and similar letters, if any, issued by the various lvlunicipal Commissioners in lhe State;

¶32

(ii) the Sub Registrars in the State shail make an endorsement at the reverse side of the first page of the document referred rn direction No.(i) that registration so done is subject to outcome of SLp (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 fited by the State Governmenl before lhe Hon,ble Supreme Court; and

¶33

(iii) in case, rt is found that there is any violation of law like plots / lands / structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer Zone / plots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement informing / cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plots; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the Hon,ble Supreme Court in SLp (Civil) No.19695 of 2021. To that effect, an endorsement shall be made on the reverse side of the first / second page of the document and also in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶34

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶35

There shall be no order as to costs

¶36

Sd/.G.SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY// L

To,

sEcTtoN OFFTCER

The^principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Revenue Department, (Stamps and ^ Registration) Secretariii Buloinqs, H:;oli;;;*'"" z. I ne uommrssioner and lnspector. General of Stamps and Registration, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶42

The Sub-Registrar,, Suryapet, Suryapet District.

¶43

one CC to Snr xrirnru Adooirr,rAi-'rnriai'U"Advocate topuct 5 rwo ccs to cp FoR srArFs & HE-ci's;Rxflbrr: Hddb;;i"r the srare or Tetangana. [OUTj 6. Two CD Co6ies

¶44

One Spare bopy

$uI-

l*=

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1510312022

ORDER WP.No.3089 of 2022

¶51

1 H e i4 14:
(
(.'
o
,-) lf 7 E.'i tiir
*

¶52

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

¶53

\V,-
-li'l "

Madhamshetti Srinivas v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhamshetti Srinivas v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandri Nagi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and another

Deeti Venkatasubbaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 6 Others

M/s.Suprabha Developers Vs The State of Telangana

Girod Sanju Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Ch. Sudarshan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

P.V. Mohan Vs The State of Telangana