Disposed

Mohammed Sayeed v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Mar 2022WP/33402/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging the refusal to register a sale deed. The Court relied on a prior common order and directed the registration authority to register the document subject to pending Supreme Court proceedings and added warnings about statutory violations.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed in terms of common order. Sub-Registrar directed to register sale deed without reference to rival instructions. Endorsement directed citing SLP pending in Supreme Court.

Mohammed Sayeed Vs State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 33402 oF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mohammed Saveed. S/o Late . Mohammed Syed , aqed about 62 years , Occ .Business , Rr/o H.No 1B_B_1g2t6iB .itiiir-drr,i, Y rndira Nagar , Midhani Depot , Hyderabad , T.S.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana, rep..by its principal Secretary( Revenue ) Having office at Secretariat Buildings. at Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner and lnspector, General of Registration and Stamps Telangana State .

¶12

Sub Registrar, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶13

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of fVlandamus decraring the action of 3rd respondent in refusing to receive' register and rerease the sare deed presented by petitioner in respect of Plot No 21 parl ( Northern part ) total admeasuring 1 52 Sq. yards in Sy. Nos.116 ( Part ), 116 / c-g ( PART) , 11s (PART) , 118 rE2, situared ar Mailardevpally Village , Rajendernagar Municipality and Mandal , Ranga Reddy District , Terangana State as arbitrary, iregar, without any jurrsdiction, contrary to the provisions of the Regrstration Act, 19oB and in vioration of Articre i 4 of the constitution of rndia, and consequentry a direction is issued to 3rdrespondent herein to receive, register and rerease the sare deed presented by petitioner in

¶15

respect^{of Plot No 21 pan (NorthernPart) total admeasurlng 152 Siq' yards in Sy'} Nos.^{116 ( Part ), 11i / a (PART) '118 (PART)'118 lE"?' 'situatedat} Mailardevpally^Village '^{Raj endernagar Municipalityand Mandal' RangaReddy} District ,^{Telangana Sl tte withoutreferenceto Nlemo No G2t?-''712019 ' dated} 2610812020

¶16

IAN O:1^{oF 2021}

¶17

din Petition^{under S sction 151 CPC praying that in the circurnsitances state} the affidavit^{filed in sul,port of the petition, the High court may tre pleasedto pass} an interim^{direction th rrebydirecting the3rd respondent herein to receive' register} and release^{the sale( leed presented by petitioner in respect of Plot No 21 part(} Northern^part )^{total almeasuring.r52 Sq. yards in Sy. Nos.116 ( Part , 116 la l(} PART) ,118^{(PART),118lE2} '^{situated at ttilailardevpally Villatler ' Rajendemagar} Municipality^{un6142nr lal' Ranga ReddyDistrict' Telangana Stalewithout reference} to Memo^{No G2t257t1O19} '^{dated2610812020}

¶18

Counsel^{for the Petii ioner :SRI' MOHAMMED ADAM} counsel^{for the Res pndents : GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISiTRATION} The Court^{macle the following: ORDER}

¶19

¶20

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE B' VIJAYSEN REDDY} WRIT PETI^{TIONN o.334020F2021}

¶21

ORDER(ORAL):

¶22

Heard both^{sides and perusedthe rnaterial on record'}

¶23

It is submitted^{by the leamed counsel on eitherside that subject matterof} this writ^{petitionis squarely coveredby the common order passedby this Court} in W.P.No.328^{of 2022and batchdated 18'02'2022' as modifiedby the order} dated^{22.02.2022in l'A'No2 of 2022in W P'No'298 5 of 2022 andbatch' and} therefore,^{keepingthe matter pendingwill not serve any purpose'as such' the} same^{may be disposed ol in tenns thereof'}

¶24

This^{Courtpassed interinr order in this writ petitiondirectingthe} respondents^{to receive'process'} :t:'.:t, i:: -':::J:il::i :ffi:T: However,^{conditions were imposcd that (a) the petltton} withdraw^{the writ petitionand (b) registrationshall be subject to final resultof} the writ Petition'

¶25

In view^{of the above' recordingthe aforesaid submission of the leamed} counsel^{on either si<Ie' follorving the cotntnon order dated18'02'2022irt} W.P.No.328^{of 2022andbatch' as modit-red by the orderdated 22'02'2022 in} I.A.No.2^{of 2022inW't'No 29t(5 ol 2022' in tenns thereof'this writpetitionis} disposed^{of as under'without any ortlcras to costs:}

¶26

(A) If^{the subject documentis hasiltave already been registered and released} Pursuant^{to theinterin-r order:}

¶27

(i ) the^{docum e"1",':?':t?:::,,} :[^j i?.?,5ffiUl,.?iiT] ti: :l!€HX"l,"[:ffi^{:l#;:"'i; oi; su Preme court; and} (ii) in case'^{it is found that there} " ?Y :i'E+"l ::fH'';l:? Iiit"ltunOtt"tr.u"tures^{being 1qd' l":' !:} zon"prot'i'""uli;;;i;"'^?01:1i:''9"['d#"3["f']i;ji"",,tt|l Regtstrar^{shall makean endorsementlr} pu'"nut""'li'r'^{l.'lrt"'' t"or"oin purchaseot suchplots:such} ,runtu"uont"^{'?'"'" n'l Lv relevani} '^{stalutoryprovisions:that} '"gi't'ut'on"ofoiti"^{",.nJ''t *01""tto outcome ol orders of the}

¶28

Hon'i,le Supreme Court in SLP^{(Civil) No.19695 of 2021. To that} effec, an endorsement shall be^{made in the erlcumbrance} recor i, website etc.

¶29

(B) lf the subje:t documenVs is/are not yet registered and^{t'e easr:dpursuant to}

¶30

the interirn order;

¶31

(i)^'he respondent - Sub-Registrar is directed k) register the docu nent of sale, transfer and^gift etc.,^{presentedfcr registration} by the^petitioner/s without reference to the^Memo Nos.;2125712019 dated 26.08.2020 and 29.12.2020 issued^by the espondent-the Commissioner and lnspector^{General of} Regi ;lration and Stamps, Telangana; Lette' No.45/TP/NMC/201S dated 01.11.20'19 isstted by the resp(,ndent-the Commissioner, Municipal Corporat ol), Nizampet to tl e respondent-the Sub Registrar, Quthbullapur,^Ranga Red( y District, and similar letters, if any, issued t,y the^various Muni :ipal Commissioners in the State;

¶32

(ii) tl': Sub Registrars in the State shall make an errdrrsement at the r rverse side of the first^page of the document referredⁱⁿ direc ion No.(i) that registration so done is subject lo ouhome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State^(lovernment befor e the Hon'ble Supreme Court; and

¶33

(iii) il case, it is found that there is any violatic'n of law like plots lands/structures being sold form parl of F.T.L. ancj Euffer Zon€^/Plots having less than 30 feet road width^{ac,less,lhe Sub} Regi ;trar shall make an endorsement informing/c:a rtioning^the purclrasers that risk is involved in purchase of su(:h plols; such trans actions are hit by relevanl statutory^{provsions;that} regis .ration of the same is subject to outcome of o'der:; of lhe Hon' )le Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 1 9695 of 2t,21 .^To that effec., an endorsement shall be made on the reverse side of the firsUr econd page of the document and also in the encunlbrance recor d, website etc.

¶34

As a seque thereto, miscellaneous petitions. if any. pcrttlirrg in this^writ

¶35

petition stand clos:d.

¶36

d -

¶37

SD/.K.ONESIM

¶38

ASSIS'TANT^REGISTRAR ,'"' //TRUECoPY// ,.,\i

¶39

SECTION^OFFICER

¶40

'o'.,^{principalSecretary(Revenue) Havingoffice at secretara: Burldings' Stateof} , H'"'tt"llfl*^{[lt?'313i;"ctor'Generar or Resistratic'nanc Stamps} Telangana^{Sl ate} . ,'.('ur^{r'r he} I tliff",;$ffiffifl#{gtr1l{ki?Bt'l

¶41

6 Two CI)^{CoP es} 7 One SPare^{C oPY}

.-\

[,,]^q I

HIGH COUP.T

DATED:1610312'.t22

ORDER

WP.No.334tl2 cl'2021

-- ':: - ---
- :-, i ...l ,1 ...*.
tl
r - '.'. 't.
,-a <br>'a: .. ti
( t :i 3'--P ?$72 .;l
\ .' /

¶49

DISPOSING OT THE WRIT PETITION

¶50

WITHOUT COS'TS

¶51

l.'a<br>\12

Mohammed Sayeed v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Sayeed v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandu Delli Babu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Madhamshetti Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Hussain Vs The State of Telangana

Konduru Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Riyaz Vs State of Telangana

Konda Himakar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana