Petitioners sought writ under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC directing respondents to allot excess land in their possession upon payment of market value. The High Court held petitions lacked substance as no government scheme existed.
Dismissal of writ petition pending under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ArHYDE RABAD H, c Hc o u Rr' " i JX"HI6l:r ff 5, :::,:),:fili wEDNESDAYTHE slxrEENrl Dly9rr:BRUARY rWOTHOUSNND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE B'VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITIONNO:26929 o F 2021
| Betw - 1 , " " , . 7 8 |
een: '1^rr^r^ YedulaShankaraiah S/oLateBala' Aqriculture.R/ovu'rutn"u'-ui'p"utiy* ?:'jli:Anjaneyuru,S/eLa!e-!.ala, Agriculture,R/oVal X#;rH,t'',,i;fl 31?i'X'u ?:i'ii:,f:',",':ot;,ijBn',?l3o?if Aqriculture,R/ova ?tJi,:r[:Ti[i{fl,}3,'i,{3i]l T:ly':''I["JilwioSiva AqricurtureR/o"!' '[i,ri'"]o'uv District. VeOutaBalaSwamy.SroPar nEilritrI".{,"Valldbhuraopallv District. aedutaSrinivasulu.s/oPars iEi!li,r[',ni" -Vatiannuraopall District. |
.han.lr 'gh?ldtu -virr'g"H ?,fflj,u'fl u",,?#'u 9l1?t1:' u,X',",? Kumar viriug sha'Ved Vrllage haVedhi vVillase |
2i2haoedabout l?, liolit-"tr'lanoat'lt/ 1?;,uun"^t"fl3:i]t 'flllai'?ntf"333i" 'il;61fln"$,X?'# fti,x:'J,i,{inTio? 'aqed about "Hi'olirManda hi ' aoedabout l.,lio'irtN,4andal aged Midiil about N,4and |
57yearsocc ahabubnagar '^rtil33l';"?i5; '%il;3t';"?35; X?,il331';"?'T; *t'osricurture' 28"v:?l::--o" ll'4ahabubnaqar 34Years,Occ' al.[/ahabubnagar 44 yea$Occ' l,4ahabLlbnagar ,..PETITIONER(S) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AND 1 |
District. rhesra teorr e r a nsa n a,F:&#,i Department,Secretarlat'5e TheChiefCommissioner' CCLA' TheDistrictCollector,Mahabubn TheRevenueDivisionalOfficer' 2. 3. 4 5 TheTahsildar,MidjilMandal' tr'4a |
:iEil[SIH Stateof agar'Ma Mahabub habubna |
A:ii,TSl3'J; X"" Telangana'Hydera habubnagar Distri nagarDivision'M gar' lvlahabubnaga |
""'" bad ' ct' ahabubnagar r District' |
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondent Nos.2 to 5 in non-considering the representation of thepetitioner and non-initiatingto allot the lands to thepetitioners by collecting the marketthe value on cultivating lands of the petitioners in respect of the agricultureland in Sy.No.98 to an extent of Ac.4.0O gts in situated at Vaspula Revenue Village shivar, Midjil Mandal, [t/ahabubnagar District, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violationof Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Violation ofArticles 14and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect therespondent Nos.2to 5 to consider the representation of thepetitioner and non-initiate toallotthe lands to thepetitioners by collecting the market thevalue oncultivating lands of the petitioners in respect of the agriculture land in Sy.No.9B to an extent of Ac.4.00gts in situated at Vaspula Revenue Village shivar, N/idjiltVandal,N/ahabubnagar District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider therepresentationof the petitioner and non- initiate to allot the lands to thepetitioners by collectingthe market the valueon cultivatinq lands of thepetitioners in respect ofthe agriculture landin Sy.No.9Bto an extent of Ac.4.00gts in situated atVaspula Revenue Village shivar,lVlidjil lVandal, l\4ahabubnagar Districtpending disposal ofthe writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE(TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B,VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION 0.26929 of 2021
ORDER:
The grievance of thepetitionersis that the respondents No'2 to 5 are not consideringtheir representationior ailotting land by co ecting the marketvaiue in Sy No.98 in an exrenl oi Ac 4'C0 Er.in:a-ssltLiateo al VasDUia Reven'JeVillageShivar,l"lidiilN4andal, f,lanaD.,jbnaEar Dlstrici, and the sameis lllegai,arbliraryand un ccn sirtution ai.
2
respondentsNo.4and 5 to conductenquiry' The respondentNo'5 and his staffvisitedthe land of the petitioners and conducted panchanama andenquiryon 21't2'20t9' They found that the petitioners are cultivatingtheexcess land ofAc'4'00' The respondentNo.5 conducted panchanama and submitteda report to therespondent No,4 The respondentNo 4 also proposed to the respondentNo.2 to allot the land to the petitioners by collecting thema rket value.
The petitioners cannot have vested right to seek allotment and
regularization on payment of market value.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
,TRUE COPY' SECTI ICER M]
I\4N/A
BS
xN)
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 610212022
ORDER
WP.No.26929 of 2021
c B l" <br>( ,,.
vl
lg APB2W2
/
/'/
P/iT,)i r
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
q""*"
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the Government to allot land in possession of petitioners for regularization on payment of market value under Article 226.
Whether petitioners have a vested right to seek allotment and regularization on payment of market value.
Whether petitions presented for land allotment have merits of regularization without relevant scheme or policy.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yedula Shankaraiah and others
The Chief Commissioner, CCLA
The District Collector, Mahabubnagar
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar, Midjil Mandal
Justice Vijaysenreddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
