Petitioner challenged non-absorption into service. Respondents rejected the representation dated 04.06.2022. Court held petition infructuous and closed it, granting liberty to file fresh petition.
Writ petition closed; liberty to file fresh writ challenging rejection order dated 04.06.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTHDAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE P.MADHAVIDEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 224480F2022
Between:
T. VenkateswaraRao S/o. late T. KrishnamurthY Aged about 46years, OccUn- employee, R/o.9-2-3'1 i;;;h;I coid"v, iir"nir,i, Bh adradri-Kothagudem District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ or directionparticularlyone in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAIVUS, declaringthe action of the respondentsnot taking the petitioner into service for his absorption asper the letter dated29.07.2020as arbitrary, discriminatory,unjust,and in violationof Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequentlydirectthe respondentsto consider the petitioner's application submitted before the 4threspondent on 05.08.2017for his absorption in the interest ofjustice.
2
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto direct the respondents toprocess thepetitioner letter submittedon 05.08.2017 along with the petitionefs bio-data for hisabsorption pending disposalof the above writpetition in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl.V NARASIMHAGOUD
Counsel forthe Respondents:K. UDAYASRI
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO.22448 OF 2022
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this Writ Petition, the respondents have disposed ofthe representation of the petitioner for absorption on par with outsourced personnel and have rejected the same vide proceedings dt.04.00.2022 andthe rejection order has been served on the petitioner. He also submits that in view of the rejection proceedings dt.04.06.2022, the petitioner may be given liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
2, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents is also heard.
4, The Writ Petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs.
W.l>.No.2244i1 ol' 2022
2
also stand closed.
SD/.K.ONESIM DERPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// G
SECTION OFFICER
To,
S.D GJP
,,4
4
HIGH COURT DATED i 1310712022
ORDER
WP.No.22448 ot 2022
t.):-
t v
L-<br>11 AIJE 2CII2
c)
,+
i!?uror-r,,V
-__i::::rrt ,
CLOSING THE WRITPETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@
*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for absorption into service is infructuous after the rejection of the petitioner's representation.
Whether the petitioner be given liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the rejection order.
T. Venkateswara Rao
Telangana State Power Generation Corporation
The Superintending Engineer, Kothagudem Thermal Power Station
The Chief Engineer, Kothagudem Thermal Power Station
The Divisional Engineer, Kothagudem Thermal Power Station
P. MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
