Bench dismissed Writ Petition No.20915 of 2015 as withdrawn by the petitioner who opted for the One Time Settlement scheme, without costs.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; case dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 20915 OF 2015
Between:
M/s. Meera Automobiles,, D.No. 1 -16-336/'t,lGar Petrol pump, Kagaznagar, Adilabad. Rep. by its Proprietrix Smt.Komal Khatwani.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction declaring the impugned penalty order passed by the 2" respondent dated 25.06.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law andjurisdiction, and violation of principles of naturaljustice and time barred and set aside the sa me
,/
I i
I i
WVMP. NO:4556 Of f015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed r support of the petition, the High Coui may be pleased to vacate the interim or Jers dated 14.7.2015 passed in wPMP.l'1o.26944 ot 2015 in WP.No.209'15 ot 20' 5.
WPMP. NC': 26944 C: :1015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the 3rrcum,;tances stated in the affidavit filed r support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all fu ther proceedings including any recov()ry o1' the disputed amounts, pursuant io the impugned assessment order passerl by the 2nd respondent in Form lA.f 2O3 dated 25.06.2015 for the pericJ .July' 2009 to June 2010 under APVAT, ,ct 2005, pending disposal of the Writ F'€,tition, as othenarise, the petitioner will be lut to severe loss and hardship.
Counsel for the Peti ioner: SRI SIDDHARTH REDDY for SRI 3r{AS;KAR REDDY VEMIREDDY
Counsel for the Res rondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY, SC for ()"
The Court made thetollowing: ORDER
/
1
.IH B T AN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
W.P.No. 20915 of 2ll5
ORDER. r?r,, rr,e t10n'bh the Chiel lantte Lljal Bby.an)
l{eard N{r. Siddharth Reddv, lcarned counsel For the petitioncr and lUr. I(.Raji Itecldy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for thc
(lommcrcial T'ax Dcpartment appearing for the respondents.
optcd lor One'['ime Settlement (OTS) scheme announccd bv (]rrvcrnnrcnt of'fclangana in tcrms of G.O.Ms.No.45 dated 09.05.2022; l'hercttrrc, pctitioner rvould like to withdraw the present writ petitron.
r\s a scquel. miscellaneous petitions, pending iI any, stand
cltsntissccl.
SD/. AMMAJI ISTRAR ASSISTAN
,TTRUECOPY" SECT FFICER
To,
MRC
SB
?
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1 3109'2022
ORDER
WP.No.2091f of 2015
-<br>t,r,r. <br>/ "?
T
s t ) ll
lr l
!"l,!l"l .c_)
.-A'
i
,,c,'- \ J,i
a.)
-.--
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDR/ IWN WITHOUT COSTS (rqt'
fo
15Y
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Meera Automobiles
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Sirpur Kagaznagar
Commercial Tax Officer, Mancherial Circle
Deputy Commissioner (CT), Adilabad
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Telangana
State of Telangana/Andhra Pradesh
Ujjal Bhuyan
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
