The High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No. 257 of 2020 without costs as no order was called for based on the common judgment handed down on the same day in other related writ appeals.
The writ appeal was disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO: 257 OF 2020
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated.29 101 12020 in W. P. No. 1 0397 120 1 I, on the file of the High Court.
Between:
...Appellants/Respondent Nos.1 to 3
AND
The lndian Railway Welfare Organisation (IRWO), Railway Offices Complex, Shivaji Bridge (Behind Shankar Market) New Delhi - 1 10001 (Rep. by its Project Manager)
...RespondenUWrit Petitioner
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of thejudgment dated 29-01-2020 made in WP No. 10397 of 2019 pending disposal of this writ appeal.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI A.SANJEEV KUMAR representing SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC FOR TSIIC
Counsel for Respondent SRI K.V.SIMHADRI, SENIOR COUNSg-
The Court delivered the following:
T IE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, U.T.J TJ, BHI.IYAN
AND
1 :Ilt HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BttASili}JL REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.257 of 2itatil':l
JUDGME IT: Per tte tton'bte the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhullan)
He, r,1 Mr. A.Sanjeev Kumar, learnc:,:((,runsel for the appellan s and Mr. K.V.Simhadri, learnecl tienior Counsel appearin 1 lbr the respondent.
Mis<:llaneous applications pending. if any, shall
stand clos )d. However, there shall be no ord€x' as to costs.
I
SD/. K. SAILESHI DEI)UNl REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// ( u', IJECTION OFFICER
To, 't. One CC to SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC for TSilC fOpUCl ?. 9n.CC to SRI ( V.SIMHADRI, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two C.D. Copie;. 4. One Spare Cop'. MRC GJP
?
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 210)t2022
JUDGMENT
WA.No.257 o 2020
1 I
I t
C- <br>s"- a)
c-<br>L)
\
(
?-.'^
DISPOSING O: THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT CO:iTS
@*64 k"-
TS Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.
Respondents
Ujjal Bhuyan
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
