Disposed

M/SSree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. The Indian Railway Welfare Organization ( Irwo) and 3 Others

Telangana HC12 Sept 2022WA/189/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Appeal was disposed of as a common judgment was passed that day in connected cases. No separate order was called for in the present appeal. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal disposed of without order. Miscellaneous applications closed without costs.

What the court decided

M/SSree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing… — Company and Corporate | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C,V, BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT APPEAL NO: 189 OF 2020

¶7

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the Order Dated 2910112020 Passed in W.P.No.1039712020 on the file of the High Court.

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/s.Sree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Limited, A cooperative society registered under the provisions Of A.P. Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995 Plot No. 12112,lDA Cherlapally Phase-ll, MedchalMalkajgiri District Represented by its Secretary Sri. K. Appi Reddy S/o Late Sri. K. Pichi Reddy Aged.63 years, C/o M/s Sri. Anjaneya Polymers lndia Pvt. Ltd. Plot NO. 190/10 Phase- ll, IDA Cherlapally, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/THIRD PARTY

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The lndian Railway Welfare Organization ( IRWO) and 3 Others, Railway Offices complex, Shivaji Bridge, ( BehindShanker Market), New Delhi Represented by its Project Manager.

¶13

....RESPONDENT No.1/WRIT PETITIONER

¶14

Telangana State lnd lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, Represented by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director Parishrama Bhavanr, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad.

¶15

Telangana State lnd lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, Represented by its Executive Director ( Estates and Administration) Parishrama Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad.

¶16

Telangana State lnd lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, Represented by its Zonal Manager, Zonal Office Moulali, Hyderabad.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶18

|.A.NO:2 OF 2020

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 89 days in filing the present writ appeal against the orders dated 28101 12020 passed in W.P.No.10397 12019.

¶20

l.A.NO:4 OF 2020

¶21

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in iupport of the^petition, the High Courl ma)' be^pleased to suspend the orders dated 2Q10112020 passed in W.P.Nr:.10397/2019 in the interests of^justice, a; otherwisb the petitioner will be^put to irreparable loss and inju ry.

¶22

Counsel for the App( llant : SRI.A.P.VENUGOPAL, ADV FOF: M/S.CH.VEDAVANI

¶23

Counsel for the Resp ondent No.1: M/S.K.V.SIMHADRI

¶24

Counsel for the Respond rnt Nos.2 to 4 : SRI.A.SANJEEV KUMAR / ADOL. ADV GENERAL

¶25

The Court made the f rllowing Judgment : -

¶26

THE HON'BL^{ETHECHIEF JUSTICEUJJALBHIIYAN} AND

¶27

THEH^{ON'BLE SRIJUSTICEC.V.BHAS KARREDDY}

¶28

WRIT^{APPEALNo. 189 o} f²⁰²⁰

¶29

JUDGM^ENT: (Per the Hon'ble^{the ChielJuslice L|taltshuAan)}

¶30

In view^{of the common judgmentpassed today in} W.A.Nos.^{1187 of 2018, 4Bl of 2Ol9' 484 of 2Ol9 and 285} of 2O2O^{as well as the orderpassed in W'A'No'257 of 2O2O'} no order^{is ca1led for in this writ appeal'}

¶31

Writ appeal^{is accordingiydisposed of'}

¶32

Miscellaneous^{applications pending' ifany' shall}

¶33

stand closed.^{However, there shallbe no order as to costs'}

¶34

SD/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REG ]STRAR //TRUE COPY// ': l.'l.'

': l.'l.'

SECTION OFFICER

The Project Manager, lndian Railway Welfare Organization ( IRWO) and 3 Others, Railway Offices complex, Shivaji Bridge, ( BehindShanker Market), New Delhi.

¶39

The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana State lnd lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, Parishrama Bhavanr, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad.

¶40

The Executive Director, Telangana State lnd nfrastructure Corporation Ltd, (Estates and Administration) Parishrama Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad.

¶41

The Zonal Manager, Telangana State lnd lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, Zonal Office Moulali, Hyderabad.

¶42

Two CC to Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶43

One CC to M/S.CH.VEDAVANI, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to M/s.K.V.SIMHADRI, Advocate IOPUC] B. One CC to SRI.A.SANJEEV KUMAR, Addl. Advocate General (OPUC) 9. Two CD Copies 10.One spare copy

s.A GJPr>i.)<

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210912022

JUDGMENT

WA.No.189 of 2020

itfr1

OISPOSING OF THE W.A.

¶51

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶52

ro \0v'
A'5>

M/SSree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. The Indian Railway Welfare Organization ( Irwo) and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M/SSree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. The Indian Railway Welfare Organization ( Irwo) and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Prl Commr of Income Tax - 7, Hyderabad Vs Deccan Grameena Bank, Hyderabad

M/s. Sunrise Homes Limited, Vs The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd Vs M/S Adp Pvt. Ltd., Hyd

M/s Sree Krishna Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Limited Vs The Indian Railway Welfare Organization ( Irwo) and 4 Others

Ts Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. and 2 others Vs The Indian Railway Welfare Organisation (Irwo)

M/s Yashoda Hospitals, Rep. by its General Manager Vs Bhavya Health Services Private Limited