Advanced order in a writ petition for habeas corpus seeking release of a detenu from Central Prison. The High Court set aside the impugned detention and confirmation orders without issuing detailed reasons in this advance order.
Impugned detention order and confirmation order set aside; detenu directed to be released forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ' - (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI
WRIT P ETITIONNO: 20252oF 2022
Between:
Utkoor Narsimha @Narsi, S/oUtkoor Venkappa'aged.30years' Occ Labour' ili]Bn,iri;ir'iJgr;B"i"srG'tt'4ehdipatnam' Hvderabad
...pETt,oNER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issuean appropriateWrit'Order or Direction' more particularlyonein thenatureofWritofHabeasCorpus,directing3rdRespondenttoproducethe detenuei.e.UtkoorNarsimha@NarsinowdetainedinCentralPrisonHyderabad' at chanchalgudabeforethis Hon,ble court and set-asidethe impugned detention orderpassedby the 2nd Respondent vide SB (l) No'367/PD-6/HYD/2021'dt' 3O-11-2021and ConfirmationOrder vide G'O Rt'No'448' dated23-02-2022 passed by 1"'Respondentas beingillegal' arbitrary' improper'unilateral' un constitutionaland violativeof Article 21 and 22 of the Constitutionof lndia'and to forthwithrelease the Detenue'
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI'PASHAMTRIVIKRAMREDDY
Counselfor the Respondents:THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
IT IS ORDEREDAS FOLLOWS
THE HON,BLE DT, JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADISRIDEVI
WRIT PETITION No.2O25 2 0F 2022
ADVANC ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,l)
In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed'The impugned detention order vide SB(I).No.367lPD-6lHYDl 2021, dated 30.t7.202L,passed by therespondent No.2,and the consequential confirmation order videG.O.Rt.No.44B, General Administration(Spl. (Law & Order))Department, dated 23.02.2022,passedby the respondent No.1, are hereby set aside, The respondents aredirectedto set the detenu, namely Utkoor Narsimha @ Narsi, S/o.Utkoor Venkappa,at liberty forthwith, if he is no longer requiredin any other criminal case.
(Detailed order follows)
SD/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( ir' , SECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY'
To,
^Telangan_aat Hyderabad. [OUT] 6. Two CD CooiesTwo CD CooiesCooies
HIGH COURT
Dr.SA,J & JS,J
DATE D: 1 610612022
ADVANCEORDER
W.P.No.20252 of2022
1 t E TA 15
7
2l
oo 1 E JUt{ 20?2
a
*
i
P Tc
ALLOWINGTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for habeas corpus to produce the detenu and set aside the detention orders is maintainable.
Whether the detention orders passed by Respondents 2 and 1 are illegal, arbitrary, improper, and violative of fundamental rights.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Utkoor Narsimha @ Narsi
The State of Telangana
District Magistrate (Executive), Hyderabad City
Superintendent, Central Prison Hyderabad
Dr. Justice Shameem Akther
Justice Juwadi Sridevi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
