Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

K. Hannah Vs K.V. Bhaskar Rao — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

Home
Telangana HC
2022
K. Hannah Vs K.V. Bhaskar RaoK. Hannah v. K.V. Bhaskar Rao

Dismissed

K. Hannah v. K.V. Bhaskar Rao

Telangana HC15 Jun 2022CMA/28/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for default as neither party appeared to present arguments on the date of hearing.

What did the court decide?

None granted; appeal dismissed due to default.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 28 OF 2009

Appeal Under Section 39 of Special Marriage Act, against the order and decree in O.P.No.552 of 2004 dated02.06.2008 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

Between:

K. Hannah, Wo K.V.Bhaskiar Rao, aged 46 years, Occ: Unemployed R/o 1-3-5/5-2, Dhruvayamini Apartments, Street f{o.4, Habsiguda,

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT

AND

K.V. Bhaskar Rao, S/o Late K.J.S. Rao, aged 50 years, Occ: BPCL Employee R/o 36-133, Defence Colony, Secunderabad.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
K. Hannah
respondent
K.V. Bhaskar Rao

Coram

AI extract

Justice Shameem Akther

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 15 Jun 2022 · June
Registered: 23 Jan 2009
Case no.: CMA/28/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Juvvadi Sridevi Shameem Akther

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Smt. Undekari Bharathi and 3 Others
14 Jun 2022
National Insurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs D. Kiran Kumar and Another
14 Jun 2022
Mannan Aligane Vs The State of Telangana
14 Jun 2022
Ayesha Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others
15 Jun 2022

Cite this judgement

K. Hannah v. K.V. Bhaskar Rao, CMA/28/2009 (TEL), decided on 15 June 2022.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Justice Shameem Akther and Justice Juwadi Sridevi

Parties & counsel

Outcome

None granted; appeal dismissed due to default.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Appeal dismissed due to non-appearance of both parties, indicating appellant's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. No costs awarded.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

CMAMP. NO: 58 OF 2009

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleasedgrant stay of operation of the decree and^judgment dated 2-6-2008^passed in OP.No.552 of^{2004on the} file of the Addl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar.

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S. RAMACHANDRA PRASAD^(Not Present)

Counsel for the Respondent: SMT. P. MEENAKSHI

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

--7

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.28 OF 2OO9

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'bte Dr.SA,J )

On 27.04.2022, as there was no representation for both sides, the matter^r,vas directed to be listed today under the caption 'for orders'. Even today, there is no representation for both sides. It appears that the appellant has no interest to pursue the matter.

2, Under these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for defa u lt.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

\

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- B.S. CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTIO N OFFI CER

To,

1 The ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar,

Hyderabad. (with records)

2 One CC to Sri S. Ramachandra Prasad, Advocate IOPUCI

3 One CC to Smt. P. Meenakshi, Advocate [OPUC]

4 Two CD Copies c One Spare Copy

s^br ^<sup>p-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1510612022

JUDGMENT

CMA.No.28 of 2009

I'r $ -iilE S14 )"4.
o i ;nru lli,i
il'-34/

DISMISSING THE CMA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS

<sup>DC (- \rz^,--

Justice Juwadi Sridevi

CNR

HBHC010052282009

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Juvvadi Sridevi Shameem Akther

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Smt. Parveen Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

15 Jun 2022

Shakeel Pasha Vs The State of Telangana

15 Jun 2022