Allowed

Ayesha Begum v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Telangana HC15 Jun 2022WP/6830/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed this writ petition for habeas corpus. It set aside the detention order dated 04.11.2021 and the confirmation order dated 03.03.2022, directing the respondents to release the detenue immediately unless involved in other criminal cases.

What did the court decide?

The impugned detention order and confirmation order are set aside; the detenu is directed to be set at liberty forthwith.

Ayesha Begum Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶5

Between:

¶6

WRIT PETITION N O: 6830 OF 2022

¶7

Ayu.lq .P"gqr,^{W/o. Arif Hussain, Age-d about 45 years,} Occ. Househotd, R/o. H.No.18-1-35ot11t12. yousuiain" Coiony, nidsnapuraml ffyO-,r",in-ji, Telangana.

¶8

AND

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

The state of relangana, Through Generar Administration (spl.(Law ancr ur0er)) uepartment, Rep.by its principal Secretary, Secretariat building-, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Superintendent, Central prison, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad.

¶13

.,RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue wRlr oF HABEAS coRpus declaring the order of detention vide SB(l) No. 324tPD-7tHyDl2O21, dated. 04112t2021 passed by the 2nd respondent and c.O.Rt.No.489, dated 03.03.2022 confirmed by 1"t respondent as arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to law and violative of Art.21 of the constitution of lndia and consequen y direct the 2nd Respondent to produce the detenue namely Mohammed Azher Hussain, S/o. Mohammed Arif Hussain before this Honourable Court and set me free forthwith

¶15

(prayer is amended as per court order dated 13.04.2022 in l.A.No.1 of 2022) Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI

¶16

Counsel for Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶17

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS

¶18

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

¶19

WRTT P ETITION No.683O O F 2022

¶20

ADVANCE ORDER: (per Hon,bte Dr.sA,J)

¶21

In the result, the Writ petition is allowed. The impugned detention order vide SB(I).No.324 /pD-7/HyD/ 2021, dated 04.72.2027, passed by the respondent No.2, and the consequential conFirmation order vide G.O.Rt.No.4g9, General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, dated 03.03.2022, passed by the respondent No.1, are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to set the detenu, namely Mohammed Azher Hussain, S/o. Mohammed Arif Hussain, at liberty forthwith, if he is no longer required in any other crimina I ca se.

¶22

(Detailed order foltows)

¶23

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR qu)

¶24

,TRUE COPY'

¶25

SECTION OFFICER

¶26

\ To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Through General Administration^{(SPL.(Law and} Order)) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent, Central Prison, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. (By Special Messenger) 4.t Orie CC to Sri Mohd lslamuddin Ansari Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State of^Telangana. touTl o. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy MBC SB ,t$"/

¶27

HIGH COURT

¶28

DATED: 1510612022

¶29

1 e S TA r€
,?
15 JUt.l 20u
,+
*
P41 C.

¶30

ADVANCE ORDER WP.No,6830 of 2022

¶31

6
01 h
b
r5 <br>

¶32

ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION

¶33

WITHOUT COSTS

Ayesha Begum v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayesha Begum v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Smt. Undekari Bharathi and 3 Others

National Insurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs D. Kiran Kumar and Another

Mannan Aligane Vs The State of Telangana

K. Hannah Vs K.V. Bhaskar Rao

Smt. Parveen Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Shakeel Pasha Vs The State of Telangana