Disposed

Pothuganti Jyothi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Apr 2022WP/20106/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench disposed of the writ petition without adjudicating its merits by recording counsel's submission that similar orders had already been passed in a batch of related writ petitions, directing the respondents to reconsider the duty-bound applicant's application within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's application within four weeks.

Pothuganti Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B,VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 20106 OF²⁰²²

¶6

Between:

¶7

Pothuganti Jyothi, Wo Attimalla^{Balaraju,..Age,. 35 y-ears,Occu.. SecondaryGrade} Teachir, Address. H.No. 3-87, Bachani:ally^{village, Bheemgal1vlandal, Nizamabad} District -503307

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by Principal Secretary to the Government,} School Education Department,^{BRKRBhavan, Hyderabad.}

¶11

The Director of School^{Education,Saifabad, Hyderabad.}

¶12

The District Educational Officer,^{NizamabadDistrict.}

¶13

The District Educational^{Officer, Kamareddy District.}

¶14

,..RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article²²⁶ of^{lhe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or^{any other appropriatewrit, order or} direction declaring the^{allotment of the Petitionerto the KamareddyDistrict Local} Cadre by th; Respondents vide orders^{bearing Proc'No'} ES/ES/NI/KAMAi SEGR/3166 dl.2ol2l2o21 and Proc'

¶16

No.ES/SC/KAMAiSEGR/0252 dt.^{07to1l2o22asbeing illegal, arbitrary,} unconstitutional, in^{violation of the principles of naturaljustice and in violation of} Articles 14 and.21 of^{the constitution of lndia and consequentlyto set aside the} same and direct the^{Respondentsto allot the Petitioner to a school in the} Nizamabad District Local^Cadre.

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶18

Petition under Sectio n 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in^suPPo r1 of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} direct the ResPondents to consider the appeal^{dated 22'12.2021 and} representation dt.31^{.03.2022filedbythe Petitioner seeking change of cadre to} Nizamabad District^{Local cadre andpass} appropriate orders^forthwithand communicate the same^{to the Petitioner.}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRIRAM POLALI Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶21

WRIT PE^{TITION No. 20106 of 2022}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Heard the^{learned counsel for the petitioner'learned Assistant} Government^{Pleaderfor Services-I,and perused the material on record'}

¶24

2,Learnedcounselforbothsidesreportthatinsimilar circumstances,^{this Court passed orders in W'P' No'36688 of 2O21 and} batch dated^{2a.12.2O21and, in terms thereof, this writ petition may be} disposed^of.

¶25

Therefore,^{recordingthe aforesaid submissionof the learned} counsel on^{either side, followingthe order in W'P' No 36688of 2O2l} and batch^{dated28.12.2021 , in terms thereof, this writ petitionis} disposed of^{directing the Respondents to considerthe petitioner's} application/^{appeal dated22'12'2021 andrepresentationdated} 3O.3.2O22 and^{pass appropriate orders thereon'in accordancewith} law, within^{a period of four (4) weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy} of this order.^{The miscellaneousapplications, if any, shal1 stand}

¶26

closed.^{No costs}

¶27

SD/.T.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

¶28

-i //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

¶31

1 The Principal Secretary^{to the Government' State.ofTelangana'School} i;;;riffi^{"r;p-;'i#(BRKRBh'u'n' Hvderabad'}

¶32

The^{Director of SchoolEducation' Saifabad'Hyderabad}

¶33

The District Educational Officer, Nizamabad District.

¶34

The District Educational Officer, Kamareddy District.

¶35

One CC to SRI SRIRAIV POLALI Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana. [ouT]

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

B. One Spare Copy

¶39

¶40

MIMA \i'

¶41

HIGH^COURT

¶42

DATED:22l0412022

¶43

ORDER WP.No.20106 of 2022

¶44

,i /' 4 ,.€
i_.() 1 E JUi,l 20t2
..)
i,
ur" ,a'

¶45

DISPOSED OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

l\o<br>\)
N<-./
,\u<br>

Pothuganti Jyothi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pothuganti Jyothi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarikona Sateesh Kumar Vs The District Educational Officer

G. Padmavathi Vs The State of Telangana

J. Prabhakar Reddy Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Mettupalli Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Akkala Shekar Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kura Nagarani Vs the State of Telangana