In a writ and miscellaneous petition challenging official posting counseling before spouse cases were allotted, the High Court disposed of the matter accordingly by directing respondents to consider pending representations within four weeks, excluding the current petitions from record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 4723 OF 2022
Between:
Sarikona Sateesh Kumar, S/o. Rama Raju, Aged about 46years, SchoolAssistant (P.S.), Z.P. High School, Kotamarthi, Addagudur lvlandal, Yadadri-Bhongir District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articte 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondentsin conducting posting counselingfor the posts of School Assistants (Physical science) in Yadadri-Bhongirdistrict even before allotment of spouse caseshave been done in contraventionof Government Memo.. No.1655/5PF-1t2021-8,dated24-12-2021, thereby depriving thepetitioner forposting to a nearby place of working of his wife as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust,discriminatory and violativeof Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia besidesbeing in contravention of the policy of the Government and consequently direct therespondentsto accommodatethe petitioner as School Assistant (PS) at any nearbyplaceto the working place of his wife in terms of thepolicy of the Government, if necessary, by conducting
fresh posting counseling in terms of Government.Memo. No. 1655/5pF-1lZO21-8, daled 24-12-2O21, with all consequential benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his retention at ZPHS Janagam of Narayanpur Mandal, where the petitioner is working before his allotment took place to Nalgonda District or alternatively direct the respondents to conduct fresh posting counseling in terms of Government l\rlemo. No. 1655/5PF-1/2021-8, dated 24-12-2021 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. P NARASIMHA
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR SERVICE - |
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.4723 of 2022
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Service-I and perused the record.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the writ
petition shall stand closed, There shall be no order as to costs.
I SD/.L.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT-REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// ()0 SECTION OFFIGER
To,
10.One Spare Copy
L,/
V
HIGH COURT
DATED | 2110412022
1$: s 14 rg.
I co 2t lu[ 2w
.o
A
<br>PATC.I
ORDER
W.P.No.4723 of 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
rV'
2 issues framed by the court
To rule on petitions challenging posting counseling for School Assistants before spouse cases were allotted.
Whether the impugned action was illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.36688 of 2021 and batch dated 28.12.2021Followed¶26
Sarikona Sateesh Kumar
District Educational Officer, Yadadri-Bhongir District
District Educational Officer, Nalgonda District
District Collector, Yadadri-Bhongir District
Director of School Education, Telangana
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
