Dismissed

J. Prabhakar Reddy v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Telangana HC21 Apr 2022WP/3819/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 3819 of 2018 as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had sought alternative employment and pension benefits. The order recorded permission for withdrawal and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the petition with dismissal of the writ and closure of pending miscellaneous petitions without costs.

J. Prabhakar Reddy Vs The Telangana State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY^{OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3819 OF²⁰¹⁸

¶7

Between:

¶8

J. Prabhakar Reddy S/o Ram^{Reddy, Aged about57} years, Driver (E.255235), Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Suryapet Bus Depot, Suryapet District.^{Telangana State}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Telangana State Road^{Transport Corporation,, Represelledby its} ^ Managing birector, Bus^{Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad,Telangana State}

¶12

2 The Reoional l,4anaqer., Telanqana^{State Road Transport Corporation,} Nalgond'a Region. N-algonda^{District,Telangana S'Late}

¶13

3 The Depot Manager,, Telangana^{State Road Transport Corporation, Suryapet} Bus Debot, Suryapet^{District, Telangana State}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of^{lhe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more^{particularlyone in the natureof} writ of lvlandamus declaring that^{the actionof the respondentsin not providing} alternative employment to the^{petitioneris bad arbitrary,illegal, unjustand} violation of the Law by setting^{aside the Proc. No.P41785(08)2O13-RM.Ndt. 02-} 01-2018 of the 2nd^{respondent hereinand consequentlydirect the respondentto} provide suitable alternative employment to^{the petitionerforthwithby treatingthe} period from unfit to providing alternative employment^{to the petitioner as on duty} for all purposes.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶17

Petition under section^{151 CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct} the respondent to^{provide alternate employment to the petitioner by suspending} the Proc.No.P4l785-08-2013^{RM.Ndt 02-01-2018 of the 2nd respondentherein.}

¶18

IA NO: 2 OF 2018

¶19

Petition under section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition, the Highcourtmay be pleased direct} the respondents to^{pay my admitted service/ terminal benefitsand alsosettle} my pension on the admitted^{my service pending this Writ Petition'}

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.^{P VENKATESWARRAO}

¶21

Counsel for the^{Respondents:SRl.A RAVI BABU, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶22

The Court made the^following:

¶23

¶24

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶25

WRIT PETITION No .38r.9 0F 2018

¶26

ORDER

¶27

Learncd counsel for the petitioncr secks permission ol the Court. to \ tthdra\' rhe \'rit petition.

¶28

I:rmission is accorded. Accordinglr., the Writ petition is

¶29

dismissecl as withdrawn. Ti'ic miscellaneous petitions pending, if ar-rv,

¶30

shall stand closed. Therc shall be no ordcr. as to costs.

¶31

sD/-T.SRlNlVA9 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

/ v/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 . One CC to Sri.^{P Venkateswar Rao, Advocate} IOPUC]

¶38

One CC to Sri. A^{Ravi Babu,SC for TSRTC} [OPUC]

¶39

Two CD Copies.

¶40

One Spare Copy

PM \BS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2110412022

o
?a x \ lul NII
a-)o
."//.,
\ ;.. ;.. ,, i. ".;.11.: .--.1
-<i .--. . - -,i; -

¶46

ORDER

¶47

WP.No.3819^{ol 20'l'8}

¶48

Dismissing^{the WP} As withdrawn Without costs.

¶49

J. Prabhakar Reddy v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Prabhakar Reddy v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Arif Mohiuddin Vs The Commissioner of Police

Sayeed Bin Salam Vs The Director

Sri. Rachuri Shankar , Shiva Shankar Vs The State of Telangana

Sarikona Sateesh Kumar Vs The District Educational Officer

G. Padmavathi Vs The State of Telangana

Narayanamma Mala Vs The State of Telangana