The Hon'ble High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 13173 of 2009 as infructuous because the petitioner had retired from service during the pendency of the petition, rendering the writ proceedings unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTHDAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 13'173 OF 2009
Between:
A.Laxmaiah, S/o. Ailaiah,aged about 56yrs,Occ:presentlyworking as Regional Transport Officer, O/o. RegionalTransport Officer,Medchal, Ranga Reddy District.
(Now working as RTO Nalgonda)
,..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the aff:Cavitfiledtherewith,the HighCourt may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction moreparticularly one in thenature of writ of "Certiorari" calling for therecords relating to the orderdated11-06-2009 in the O.A. No.1696/2008 and batch by the hon'ble A.P Administrative Tribunal and set aside the G.O.Ms.No. 245, T R &B (Ser.lV) Department dated 30.08.2007 issued by the 1"t respondent asillegal, arbitrary, ultra-vires, capriciousand violative of the principles of naturaljustice and the Presidential Order apart from violation of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitutionof lndia in the interest of justicea
I.A. NO: 1 OF 201o(WPMP. NO:21848 OF2010)
Between:
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.NO.13173 OF 2OO9
AND
..RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS lN W.P. No. 13173 of 2009
... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit us come on record as respondent No. 3 & 4 in WP No. 13173 of 2009
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl M RATNA REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR SERVICES ll
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
MIT PETITION No.l 3173 of2OO9
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Si Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is noticed that the petitioner has retired from service during the pendency of the present writ petition, thus rendering the present writ petition as infructuous.
any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTAULREGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// (3t) SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 2. . iivoOne CC CCiioto SRI -Cp M FOR RATNA REDDY SER\1CESll Advocate ,Hrgh Court for the [OPUC] State ^of Telangana tourl 3. Two CD CoPies EDS B S ,i
HIGH COURT
DATED:1911012022
ORDER
WP.No.13173 of 2009
S rAIa.
1
oo [3 l[l,l ?[u] o
+ l:s rr..:';
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS f4 t+ltw
A.Laxmaiah
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
