The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 18352 of 2020 as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to quash a tax penalty order under the TVAT Act following its selection for the One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18352 OF 2020
Between:
lVl/s. SBS Filling Station, Sy.No.176/C/2, Adj. Bachanpet Police Station, C h in nararncherla, Bachanpet. Represented by its Partner, Sri. Chitti Bhaskar, S/o' Sri Somaiah
AND
...RE''.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order dated 1510212020 passed by the 3rd respondent for the tax period Jun'2018 to Ocl201B levying penalty under section 51('1) of the TVAT as illegal, unjustified and contrary to the provisions of law besides being violative of principles of natural .iustice
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings consequent to the impugned order dated. 15.02.2020
passed by the 3rd r )spondent for the tax period Jun'2018 tc Oct'2018 during the
pendency of the ab rve writ petition
Counsel for the Pe itioner: SRI B. SRINIVAS
Counsel for Respc'rdent No. 1: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respc ldent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI K. RAJI REDDY, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FO i :OVIMERCIAL TAX
The Court made tf -. following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHI-IYAN AND THE HON'BLD SRI JUSTICE C.V.BIIASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 18352 of 2O2O
ORDER: Per ttrc t tor. bt( Lht] C/i,./ ./Lsrice uiol Bhuvanl
Heard Mr. B.Srinivas, learned counsel lor the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel lor Commerciai Tax appearing for the respondents.
Miscelir neous applications pencling, if :.:ty, shall stand closed However, there shall be lto ot (l(lr as to costs. SD/. M. MANJULA f, =,PU T!EEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' I fL) :;ECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to S B Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs tot iP For Revenue, High Court for the State rr'felan gana. 3. One CC to S i K. Ra.ii Reddy, SR. SC for Commercial T rxes(O PUC)louTl 4. Two CD Cop es 5. One Spare C rpy [/BC GJP st
I.{IGH COURT
DATt:1.)i 1610912022
s iArE
z:.
.o*
(
t
'il ),z
lEI ?trz
ORDER
WF.No 18:i52 of 2020
DISMISSIN i THE WRIT PETITION AS $III'HDRAWN,
WII-iOUT COSTS
-- +')L C> e?
M/s. SBS Filling Station
State of Telangana
Commissioner (ST)
Commercial Tax Officer
Ujjal Bhuyan
C. V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
