Dismissed
Sri Amit Kumar Agarwal, Kothapet, Rr Dist. v. N. Pulla Reddy, Rr Dist. and 4 Others
Telangana HCWA/355/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
under clause 15 of the Letters patent…
What the court decided
AI extract
under clause 15 of the Letters patent…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE GHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO: 355 0F 2011
writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 15-04-2011 in w.P.No. 217s8 of 2010 and batch on the fire of the High court.
Between:
Sri Amit. Kumar_ Agarwal, S/o. Lakshmin a.yana Aqan^/al, aged 30 years, R/o. Lakshmi Nagar Cotony, Road No. 2, H.No.9-.1 1'_1.1 14, Rothapet, R.R.Oist.'
...APPELLANT/5Ih RESPONDENT iN W.P.No.21758 OF 2010
AND
.... RES P.ND EN}XS]L?EJ'J''"I[:B
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
WAMP. NO: 783 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to
suspend the common Judgment passed in wp.No.2175Bi20'r0 & batch, pending the above writ appeal.
9:ll"_:l!rthe Appeilant: M/S BHARADWAJ ASSoctATES(NOT BETNG PRESENT) 9:lf_qL!9.the Respondent No.1: SRt o. MANoHAR REDoY(NOT BETNG PRESENT)
9:lf_:L!9.the Respondent No.2 & 3: Gp FOR AGRTCULTURE(NOT BETNG PRESENT)
9::f_:lP.the Respondent Nos.4 & S: K UpENDER REDDY(NOT BETNG PRESENT)
The Court made the foltowing: JUDGMENT
//
THE HON'BLE TH CHIEF IUSTI CE UIIAI B
AND
H V D
w.A.No. 355 o f 20tt
LUDGMENT' 1Pe/theI lo,,'bh/b? Cbief Jtn;d Ltjjal Bhryon)
None appears lor thc parucs
We have peruscd thc order dated 15.04.2011 passed by the learned Single Judgc in W.P.No.21758 of 2010.'fhe said writ
petition was heard along wirh scvcral orher writ per_itions. Writ Appcals arising out o I thosc rvrir peddons havc been dismisse d as infructuous by separatc ordcrs passcd roday.
Consequendv, this writ appcal is also dismissed AS
il1fructuous. No cosrs.
As a sequel, miscellancous pctirions, pending if any, stand
dismissed.
/
SD/.A.V.S.S.C,S.M.SARMA DEPU.rYREGIqTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEfiIONbFHCER9V r a \ttAyt"
To,
MP BS
?r\dl
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510912022
1 HE ST4 )r
ii.
2 [ [E[ ',:?z
t
JUDGMENT
WA.No.355 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
@ {^(^,\4)-y'
Sri Amit Kumar Agarwal
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Ujjal Bhuyan
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court