This High Court dismissed a writ appeal as infructuous after finding that the contract period had long expired, leaving no live issue for adjudication.
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO: 149 OF 2012
writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letterspatent preferred against the order dated 28.12.2011 in W.P.No.23906 of 2011on the file of the High Court.
Between:
.:.,
2 The S R. [Vlanager, B.P.C.L.Ltd., Ranganatham Gardens, 11th main Road, Anna Nagar. Chennai.
.,.APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS
AND
J.Ramulu, S/o Sailu R/o D.No. 3-2-6312t5, Bhavani Nagar, Mallapur, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI THOOM SRINIVAS FOR
Mr. GANESH
Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. Ms. C. SUNITHA KUMARI FOR
SRI H. V. R. R. SWAMY
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAI, BHIryAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BIIASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No. 149 of 2OL2
JTIDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal BlLuVan)
Heard Mr.Ganesh, learned counsel for the appellants and Ms.C.Sunitha Kumari, learned counsel for the re spondent.
1
issue survives for adjudicationin this writ appeal.
6 Writ appeal is accordinglydismissedas infructuous'
Miscellaneous applicationspending, if aly,shall stand closed.However,there shall be no order as to costs'
",
SD/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 1 ,..(lr" lr, I'r\r SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Mr. GANESH, Advocate [OPUCI 2. One CC to Ms. C. SUNITHA KUMARI, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CD Copies. 4. One Spare Copy MP cJP bt-... Y
f
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610912022
-7
l,) *$
!: 1
li '': s=
$)
\5
<br>\ 'r.
<br>JUDGMENT
WA.No.149 of 2012
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
,/ 0
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal became infructuous due to the expiration of the contract period?
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
J.Ramulu
UJJAL BHUYAN
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
