Dismissed

Rudroju Vimala v. State of Telangana and 4 others

Telangana HC19 Apr 2022WP/17079/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In specialized original jurisdiction, Justice Lalitha Kanne gANTI allowed the petitioner to withdraw Her writ petition challenging municipal intimation proceedings, dismissing the writ on the petitioners application with liberty to file a fresh petition and without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. No order as to costs.

Rudroju Vimala Vs State of Telangana and 4 others — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 17079 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Rudroju Vimala, W/o. Late Ram Babu, Aged 52 years, Occ. Housemaker, H. No. 2-9-683, Plot No. 235, T.N.G.Os Colony, Phase-1, R/o. Waddepally, Hanamkonda.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶11

2 The Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Waranga l.

¶12

3 The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Kazipet Circle-ll, Warangal.

¶13

4 The Assistant City Planner, Greater Warangal t\4unicipal Corporation, Kazipet Circle-ll, Warangal.

¶14

5 G. Samba Reddy, S/o. Not known to the^petitioner, Aged 55^years, Occ. Government Servant, R/o. 2-9-684, Lakshminagar, NGOs Colony, Waddepally, Hanamkonda, Warangal.

¶15

..,RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the intimation^proceedings d|.25-03-2022 in ROC.no. UC/'llW.No.58frPllClR-Xii12022, dl. 25-03-2022 issued by the 3rd respondent directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorized co nstructio n/deviated^portion, failing which prosecution will be launched against the^petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violation of^principles of natural^justice consequently set aside the same.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned intimation proceedings d|.25-03-2022 in ROC.no.UC/1/W. No. 58/TP//C| R-Xii12022, issued by 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. VENKATESWARA REDDY

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: ---

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

¶25

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶26

1YRIT PETITION No. 17079 of2022

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Sri J. Venkateswara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ

¶29

Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.

¶30

Permission is accorded.

¶31

The Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed as

¶32

withdrawn with liberty as sought. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

The miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand

closed.

SD/-K.AMMAJI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTI N OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI J. VENKATESWARA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

¶43

2 One CC to SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES [OPUC] 3 Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶44

4 Two CD Copies.

¶45

5 One spare copy. NPJ TR.)'{5 '

HIGH COURT

DATED:1910412022

ORDER

s'iAI€
7
q)
L-) 1 'J JiiN ?0?t 1l
5cl
rn s
*
ux sPATc

¶50

WP.No.17079 of 2022

¶51

DTSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶52

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶53

ar-
\ !

Rudroju Vimala v. State of Telangana and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rudroju Vimala v. State of Telangana and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poduri Ranjith Vs The State of Telangana

Malothu Purnima, Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Shah Roopraj Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Mr. Shaik Abdul Shakir Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Mr.Srikanth Vattikuti Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Chinnamaneni Sridhar Rao Vs State of Telangana