The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition, without awarding costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
J
-,nF
"t?i:is
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 12149 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent no.4 in interfering in personal life and liberty of petitioners and trying to threaten to implicate the petitioner and his family members in false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of Articles 14,21 of Constitution of lndia besides in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents more particularly respondent no.4 not to interfere into personal life and liberty of the petitioners and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent no.4 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner which is against the procedure of law and consequently direct the respondents more particularly respondent no,3 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner including calling the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. E VENKATA SIDDHARTHA
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME (TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
U/RIT PETITION No. L2L49 ot 2022
ORDER:
Sri E. Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel for the
petitioner sceks pcrmission of this Court to withdrau' the Writ
Petition with libcrty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
2 Permission is accorded. 3 Thc Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as sought. There shall be no order as to
costs.
I The misccllaneous Applications, if any shalll;tand
closed.
SD/-T.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// h)11P-" SECTION OFFICER
To,
DN
SW
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910412022
1 .rE Sl"'i: S
C--1
...
:l
L) [ 5 sEP 2U2
*
ORDER
WP.No.12149 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@'tid %ff.
Mr. Shaik Abdul Shakir
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner Of Police
The Deputy Commissioner Of Police
The Station House Officer
Lalitha Kanne yanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
