The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition, without any order as to costs. The case involved allegations of police interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Permission accorded to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE LALITHAKANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO:12145 0F 2022
Between:
Ir/r.Srikanth Vattikuti,s/o.SivasankaraRao, Age 38, occ. Business,Rl/o flat il. ;oi; f;";Jaeiriiittop Appt., Lakdikapool, Hvderabad, Telansana-500004'
...PETTTlONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be pleased to issue any writ, order orDirection moreparticularly one in the natureof writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe actionof the respondents more particularly respondent no.4 ininterfering in personal life and libertyof petitioners and trying to threaten to implicate thepetitioner and his family members in false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary,and in violation of Artictes 14,21 ot constitution of lndia besides in violation ofprinciples of natural justice and consequentlydirectthe respondents morepartibularly respondentno.4 not to interfere intopersonallife and liberty of thepetitioners.
lA NO:1oF 2022
Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfired in support of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto direct the respondentsmore particularly respondentno 4 not to interfere with the personal life andliberty of the peiitioner which is against the procedure of law and consequentlydirect the respondentsmoreparticularly respondent no'3 not to interfereWiththepersonallifeandlibertyofthepetitionerincludingcallingthe petitioner to thepolicestation pendingdisposal of the abovewrit petition'
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI E' VENKATASIDDHARTHA
Counselfor the Respondents:GP FOR HOME
The Courtmadethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNDGANTI
/
WRIT PETITION No. l2L4S of 2022
ORDER:
Sri E. Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ
Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
withdrawn with iiberty as sought. There shall be no order as to costs.
4 'I'he miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand
closed
SD K.VENKAIAH GTSTRAR ASSIST //TRUECOPY// SECloNorFICER
\
To, 1. OneCC to SRI E VENKATA SIDDHARTHA Advocate IOPUCI 2. Twoccs toG_ p FoR H.ME, High court for the stateof relanganaat Hyderabad tuur i
NPJ
BS
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 910412022
ORDER
,: 14
oo
13 JUfl
nn
o
a) *
ilA il r-, O
WP.No.12145of 2022
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS.
@tu., @
at
Ir/r. Srikanth Vattikuti
The State of Telangana Rep by its Principle Secretary
The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Zone
The Station House Officer, Nampally Police Station
Justice Lalitha Kannganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
