The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 15924 of 2008 as it was withdrawn by the petitioner with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
j
HIGH COURT FOR THE rspt","i STATT6 Jit i,o5 l[I3jl',i HYDERABAD
,oroo",rnu aau, o i, o,6^ 'w
^#L[JiI.oniriT#Bo
*"
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIE
sArlsH .HANDRA sHARMA rHE HoNouRAB.. ,,:^'r:o"JlcE ,STICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT "*,
RIT PETI TIO N NO: 159 24 0F 2 8
Between:
f #^#lt#.t**11ip{r&ii$,,h-,"s*izBEsr{['.*iisjr;j
AND
...PETITIONER
"'RESPONDENTS
"'RESPONDENTS . petition under Article 2)6 al th^^^^^.:a. 1: circumstances."iJi',"iiil,"r""tii:?,,?i$ir"";[:lll[Tr::i*:" prayins that in the Issue any writ, order or dire.ii.,.,' ;;:; j:;-;.:'l', ln: Trsh court may be pteased to l^::'';:i'n;,laHll;til"ttfr liifl .,x'$'r"'f ;[Tff Jl"HT,ffi ; :l.;::y.,;[:,;ltt;i,11:%,tiqit:"]",tiii[:ffi Iiil,"":;::,1?h:*,,"1 5-77' 578, s7e and 580 prn'Jii,"lri"r,,]"i"rl nrwat vitrage, M]ilri"ti; tli,l'6^part'' Arricle 14"and lffi_-"; ;;"ii1r,-Iansa Reddy District as iltegat, arbitrary,i;#ilJ;i respondents "",i" ii.oo'..J]" cronstitution of lndia: anrJ ,; ; ;,:' ?;s ;: i : :7: i J" r I r iiffiiir,::',: Ir l:' #1ffi il ["'eixl:ii; n r,, o. i nI ; n i,i l l i,.; " ""," "1! s ";i J; o',' B ;.i,ol Xl," ;: B 5:: J.: i;l,l : :,#?; tf ff I,
WPMP. NO: 20650 OF 2008
Petilion under Section ?, si lr :,,x ",: ft T.Jil::: :r :: :" r rff sl3: I[jt# [i,f :?J jih:;i d:tr land as stated ii o.r"rr*!",i.ffsth.e,membersof the peritjoner society from thejr lhrs altidavit in respect of ihe 1""0. .ilr",.jo i""rrl'"!, Nos. 525. s76 pad. ,rr. ,ri r,,l.,o, r ii "i gI Hl.j j r'1,'.,,i.1 10#,3 X1,ii3, 1;i g #;ffi I,1#" ;il;i,1, * JiL]J
Counsel for the petitioner:SRl. p VENUGOpAL
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe RespondentNo. 5: NONEAPPEARED
The Court madethe following:
THE
THE CIIIEF JUSTICE SATISH C STIARMA AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND
SIIAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.15924 of 2OO8
ORDER: eer tle Hon'ble the Chief J6tice S'.tish Chandrd Shtl,7:E.)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
,TRUE COPY'
SD/.B.SATYAVATH I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR&
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1, One CC to Sri. P Venugopal, Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue,High Cou(forthe State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. 4 AoL.lPrreart " PMi/ SW
HIGH COURT
D ATEO:0710212022
OROER
WP.No.'15924 of 2008
#il;GiF
(
1
,J 24 Fl!,2??
.)
'/
Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.
187/49, 2nd Floor, Flat No. 8, SV Arcade, Opp. Bank of India, Hyderabad
Special Officer-cum-Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad
Satish Chandar Sharma
Abhinand Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
