Dismissed
Harsa Rajeev Sisodiya v. the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp and 11 Others
Telangana HCCRLA/780/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
I,IONDAY .THE SEVENTHDAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLETHE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI
RIM I APP L NO: 7 oF 20
Appeal Under Section372 of Code of CriminalProcedure aggrieved ov tnrilig;"nidated 29'04-20'13in sc No' 259 of 2009on the file of the clrrt Jt tri,I AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad'
Between:
Rahesh Sisodia. Aqed about34 Years, Harsa Rajeev Sisodiya,W/o Occ:Housewife, 14, Chandan A.Rana Naoar. Jatni Road,Aurangabad, ...APPELLANT/ P.W.3 Maharashtra.
AND
| 'I.State,Rep. byPublic Prosecutor,High Court ofAndhra Pradesh' Hyderabad. |
|---|
| 2.VaibhavSisodia@Abhishek Sisodia,S/osatishChandSisodia'- aged ' ir';;;;6;;J"ff"tt"rveusinLis,RvbHNo6-3-5e6/77' Naveen Nasar' Kh;iratabadRoadNo.'l,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad' |
| 3.PeerSahebKamble@Feroz@ SatishPatilAlias P€hilwan'S/oMohd " $;,ijeJr8i"rri,6"",L"u-*:'woirtnllosirival villase'Afzalpura taluk' GulbargaDistrict,Karnataka |
| 4Md.Maosood,S/o.I,4ohdMahaboobAliaged2QVe.a1s.'Occ:Bakery -;;".i;;;t-Ri;-s]s-6aiz,virn"nBash,Za-heerab'ad'Medak District' |
| 5.RatendraKavale@Rajendra@Raju,Sio'Ravi'aged25years'Occ: "h;i;it;s*;;i.Nl;B;'dhtN/i"dir.bhatkesar, Gulbarsa' Karnataka State. |
| 6.N/lohd.ZakirAli@Gora,S/o.lVohd Mahmood Ali,Aged 27yeas' "o;;'"Bil;;ausieis,Rlo.+-:-7s, vathanBagh' Zaheerabad'Medak District. |
| 7.N,4ohd.ChandPasha@Chand, S/o'['4ohd-Mahaboob'aged 26yearsOcc: Labour,R/o.Bharathnagar,ZaheetabadZaheetaoao. |
| 8.Mohd.Ghouse@Ghouse,S/o.l'4ohdHussain' aged29,years'Occ:Fruit "ii;;i;":;;;us:niart,opp:to zaheerabad bus stand"vo.16'47'Faryaz il;il;"4""1;;y;"er,prr.-6iarnpinChavat,Zaheerabadrvlandal'Medak District. |
| 9.Saniu KumarHawalkar@Sanju.S/oParushuram'..Aged29years' "6t'JlFriiii"JnvJI"r'i"iini,r"iio*er,viiavanasar'Gulbarsa'Karnataka State. |
| 1o.ManojKumarP.Honakeri@Manoj Kumar@ Manoj'S/o Parasappa '-i6nii"ti,ased24years,oic:5iuo6ntofB C6mfirstyearatPanduranga ij"!Ii.iiloirib"rr"qL'at'e-ii"pJi-R/o'131, Gavanstioudhi'NearKhadi Machine,BijaPur,KarnatakaState. |
| 11.Mohd.Sattar@Sattar,S/o.Mohd'Moinuddin' aged.26.yearsOcc:Fruit ''iillinlst"it-Haonoarvaiiei,-R/o78/cBaisilalpet'Gandhinagar' SEil]hii,i'"u'io,i'[iwitxonir uanoal, zaheerabad'MedakDistrict |
12 Sved [,4ukram Shah @ MukramS/o. Syed Khalander' aged26 years' Occ:lron scrap businessat Gampa Basti, Subash Nagar' JeedlmetlaK-/o i-+-sz+, enot5fpur,Near Badi l'4aszrd,lvlusheerabad,Hyderabad'
..,RESPODENTS/A-1 to't 1
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl.O MANOHERREDDY
Counsel for RespondentNo.1: THE PUBLICPRoSEcUToR
Counsel for RespondentNo.2 :SRI D. PURNA CHANDRA REDoY
Counsel for RespondentNos.3 & 5 : SRIMOHD MUZAFFER ULLAH KHAN
Counsel for RespondentNo. 6 :SRI SYEDAHMEDALI
Counsel for Respondent Nos.4,7, 11 : SRI MOHD.SHAREEF
Counsel for RespondentNo. 10: SRI MOHDASHRAFALI
The Court deliveredthe following Judgment :
TIIE IION'BLE THECHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CIIANDRASIIARMA AND
THE IION'BLESRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSIIAVILI
c AL APP No. 7 Oof
JUDGMENT:i!\ti,€t!. i)':ttjt tt'r I n'\r[r sr'1r'c' '/ rrr']'r shantrol
Learned counselfor the appellart was fair enough in stating before this Court thathe does not want to pressthe present appeal and the same maybe dismissedas withdrawn'
Accordingly, thecriminalappeal is dismissedas withdrawn
Miscellaneouspetitions,if any, shall standclosed
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR V- SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The First Additional l.4etropolitanSessions Judge, Hyderabad.(with record, if any) 2. The llv Additional ChiefMetropolitanl\4agistrate 'Hyderabad. 3. The Station HouseOfficer, Panjagutta PoliceStation, Hyderabad' 4. Two CCs to PublicProsecutor,HighCourt at Hyderabad forthe Stateof Telangana(OUT) 5. one CC to SRl. O MANOHERREDDY,Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRL SYEDAHI,4EDALl, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRl. MOHDI!'IUZAFFERULLAH KHAN,AdvocateIOPUC] 8. One CC to SRl.NlD. SHAREEF, Advocate IOPUC] 9. One CC to SRl.MOHDASHRAF ALl, Advocate [OPUC] 1 O. One CC to SRl. D. PURNACHANDRAREDDY,Advocate IOPUC] 1 1 . Two CD Copies 12. One Spare Copy KUL TR ..[,-
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/0212022
I I I I I I I J
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.780 of2013
6u STA 14:
d oI l,tiff 2022 i
t
{,1
DISMISSING THE CRL.APPEAL
AS WITHDRAWN.
$6f
I
Rahesh Sisodia and others
The State
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinald Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court