Appeals filed under the Commercial Courts Act were dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant after the amount was paid. No order as to costs.
Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOFTELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
FRIDAY .THEFOURTH DAYOF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
COM M ERC OU APP NO: AND oF2
c me rcra ourt A I No. of 20
Appeal Under Section13 of the Commercial Courts' Commercial Division and CoriieicialAppellateDivision of HighCourt Act' 2015 R/w' Section37 of erUitiation andConciliation Act' 1996 igainst the orderand Decretal Order a"t"i-ii-or-zor Iin c.o.P.No"zgot zoia on the file- of the court of the Commercialcourt for Trial an-J olpo""rof Commercial Disputesat Hyderabad Jr, - iiwnaaitional chief Judge,city civil court' Hyderabad'
Between:
GVPR EnoineersLimited. Public Limited company / Havingits office at Plot No 739-A' Road No.37, /JubileeHill.' Hil;;;;;;sl nip ov li4uthorizeds'ignatory'Shri N.seshagiri Rao "'AppelUAUf/Petitioner
AND
,*x'J,:",,ilL",X;Jfl,s,[,1?^:,;,",i1?t's3[!g!&"3$J,',S3:i::Hi:Hi]H',
' W:l,f *n:3i!'XiillSiirltl-Jl-'3'i':3Hi:ffi'ar'
( RespondentNo. 1 is a formal party) "'RESPONDENTS/Respondents
lA NO:1 OF 2019
PetitlonunderSection 151CPC prayingthat in the circtrmstances statedin the li: tn''l'!'ii,.1"'n'" ',i;nl;;"SJal :? ,ttia*itiii.o"i" "p,"n " 'J:ffi:J"Htl *"i, *1,:u!i,iilill i'.iil.,, "i'0,"'' Counselfor the APPellant : SRl.DIDAVIJAYAKUMAR
Counselfor the ResPondentNo 2 : SRIS' RAJAN
COMMERCI
COURT APPEAL NO: 30 0F 2019
Appeal Under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts,Commercial Division and commercial Appellate oivision of High CourtAct, 2015 Fyw. Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the orderand DecretalOrder dated 25-01-2019 in c.o.P.No. 24 0f 2018 0n the file ofthe court of the Commercial Court for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputesat Hyderabad cum - XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
GVPR Engineers Limited, a Public Limited Company Having its office at. Plot No 739-A, Road No,37,Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -33, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, Shri N.Seshagiri Rao ...APPELLANT/ Petitioner AND
...RESPONDENTS/ Respondents
IAN O:1OF 19
Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that jn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the- petition, tirl iign Couf n uV be pleased to stay the execution of the award dated 24.06.2013 vroe irortiation eiprication No. 80 0f 2007 passed by the first respondent tilt the Oi.po.rf of rppJ"i]''",
counsel for the Appellant: sRl. olDA vtJAyA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI S. RAJAN
The Court made the folowing: COMMON ORDER
TIIE HON'BLE
CHIEF JUSTICE SATISII SIIARMA
AND
THE I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND SHAVILI
COMCA.Nos.29 and 3O of 20 19
COMMON WDGMENT t eet baHo^ bt. tt* chiel rusnc.sdrishchondtushatu)
Learned counsel for the appellantprays for withdrawal ofthe
present appeals, as the amount has already been paid'
The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending misceilaneous applications, if any, shallstand
closed. There shall be no order as tocosts.
SD/-M.SANTHI VARDHANI
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Li,-a.
SECTION OFFICER
To, '1. The Commercial Court for Trial and Disposal of CommercialDisputesat Hvderabad cum - XXIVAdditionalChiefJudge, City CivilCourt, Hyderabad' 2 It/iJ.-M.k. Constructions,A Partnership firm,havingits office at PiotNo 416, - noJO No.za, luUite" Hilla, Hyderabad - 500 033 Rep. by its Managing Partner' Sri K. AnandaKrishna. 3. a;i i. [axSHunREDDY, Managing Partner,l,4/s.Sai Krishna Constructions, TRT-11 92, Sanathnagar,Hyderabad - 500 018. 4. One CC to SRl. DIDAVIJAYAKUMAR,Advocate [OPUCI 5. one CC to SRl. s. RAJAN,Advocate [oPUC] 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy KUI, .l tr \ }_
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/0212022
COMMON ORDER
COMCA.No.29 & 30of 2019
lA
1r-l ,€
i
,3 (
.
-)f)
i.) 24 rit?"r??
r"
Dismissing the Appeals as withdrarvn.
V
18
T. Justice Sri T.Ch. Surya Rao
M/s. M.K. Constructions
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
