Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication; no costs awarded.
No costs awarded. Miscellaneous petitions pending shall stand closed (if any).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
W.P.No.14033 OF 2005
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
________________________________________ JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Date: 14.09.2022 Sus/rkk
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
W.P.No.14033 OF 2005
Date: 14.09.2022 Rkk/sus
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavaru Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
