Disposed

Dr.M.Ravikanth v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Apr 2022WP/11311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a petitioner (Deputy Lt Medical Officer) seeking the adoption of conversion procedure for an unfilled ST Women seat in General Surgery at Kakatiya Medical College, challenged the State Respondent's action. The Court disposed of the petition directing the University to consider the vacancy under the specific clause.

What did the court decide?

Directed the University to consider the vacancy arising out of the subject category in terms of Clause-XXIII of Rule IX of the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.155, Health Medical & Family Welfare (CI) Depar

Dr.M.Ravikanth Vs The State of Telangana — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY ,THE^{TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE^{CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA} AND THE HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI}

¶5

WRIT PETITION^{NO:11311 0F 2022}

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

Dr.lv1. Ravikanth,^{s/o. t,4ohanRao, Aged 39 Years, workingas Deputy lt/edical} [rp"ii"t"ri".i,^{singui"niArea Hos'prtat,Bhupatapally,N,4ancheriala District.}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

TheStateofTelangana,RepbyitsPrincipal.secretary,PublicHealthand' Family Welfare De[artment.^{Secretariat, Hyderabad'}

¶11

2 Kaloji Narayana^{Rao Universityof Health Soiences,Rep by its Registrar'} Wara ngal.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under^{Article226 of the constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be} preaseotoissueaWritorderordirectionespeciallyoneinthenatureofwritof mandamus^{d eclaring that}

¶14

a) Declaring that^{action of 2nd respondentin not adoptingthe conversron} plo.-"Ori" cintained in^{Ctause.XXlllRule.9 of the rules issuedin G.OIt/ s No'155} dated^{18.1 1.2021is illegal and arbitraryand is therefore violativeof Article14} and 21 ot the^{Constitution of lndia}

¶15

b)DecIarethatpetitionerisentitledtobeallottedaSeatinlt,4S(Surgery)in k'rfrriiy,^{tr,rtedicalCollege,Warangal in the unfilled seat of ST Women by} adopting the^{conversionp'ot"J""""ontained in ClauseXXlll of Rule 9 of rules} issu'ed in^{G.O.lr/s.No.155dated1B'112021 .}

¶16

c) Further^{decrarethat forcingthe petitioner to continue inIr,4 S (surgery)seat in} tvlamatha^{lr,4edicalcorr"g"l'Kxr;*Imi. uioraUueof Article 21 of the constitution} of the lndia

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleased to} direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith consider the case^of the^{petitioner for} allotment of l,4S (General Surgery) seat in Kakatiya^{Medical College,Warangal} by applying Clause.XXlll of Rule.lX of^{rules issued in G.O.tt/s.No.155dated} 18.11.2021 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO^MADIRAJU

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MEDICAL,^HEALTH& FAMILY WELFARE

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.PRABHAKAR^{RAO, SC for KNRU}

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE THE CH^{IEF JUSTICESATISHCHAN DRA S} AND

¶24

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEAB}IIN AND KUMARSHAVILI}

¶25

WRIT PETITION^{No' 1131I' of 2O22}

¶26

ORDER:^{(PertheITon'bIethe Chre/Justice SolishchandraShor,/.a)}

¶27

The petitioner^{before this Court has filed the present} writ petition^{praying for the follon'ing relief:-}

¶28

"For the^{reasons accompanyingthe aflidavit'it rs}

¶29

therefore^{prayedthat this Hon'bleCourtmay be pleased} to issue^{a writ order or directionespeciallyone in the} nature of^{rvrit of mandamus declaring that} a) Declaring^{lhat action ol 2'd respondentin not} adopting^{the conversion procedrlre contarned in} CIause.XXlIl^{Rule g of therules issueri in} G.O.Ms.No.155^{dated 18'112021 is illegaland}

¶30

. arbitrary^{and is therefore violativeof Article14 &} 2 1 of the Constitution^{of lndia'} Declare that^{petitioner is entitledto be allotteda}

¶31

b) seat in MS^{(Surgery)in Kakatiya MedicaiCollege'} the unfilled^{seat of ST Women} by

¶32

Warangalⁱⁿ conversion Procedure^contained in

¶33

adopting^the Clause.XXIII of Ru1e.9^{ofrulesissued} in G.O.Ms.No^{155 dated 18'112021'}

¶34

cl Further^{declarethat forcingthe petitionerto} continue^{in MS (Surgery) seatin MamathaMedical} College,^{Khamma-m is violative of Article 21 of the} Constitution^{of lndia'}

¶35

And^{pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble}

¶36

d) Court may^{deemed fit and proper inthe} circumstances^{of the case "}

¶37

It is stated^{by the learned counsel for the petitioner} thatthelisinthiswritPetitioniscoveredbl,.orderdated 1O.O3.2022^{inW.P.No. ll918 of 2022'The operative} portion of^{W.P.No.1 1918 of 2022 reads as under:-}

¶38

"It is to be^{seen that the candidature of the} petitioner is not^{rejectedas on today ln view of the} same, the^{secondrespondent-Univcrsityis directedto} consider the^{vacancy arising out of B C "E" category in} terms of Clause-XXlll^{of Rule lX of the rules issued in} G.O.Ms.No.155,^{Health Medical & Family Welfare (C1)} Department^{dated 18.11 2021 and takeaction} accordingly.^{lf the petitioneris stili aggrieved'he can} challenge the^{samein accordance wlth law"}

¶39

The same is^{not disputedby the learnedStanding} Counsel for the^{respondentNo.2.}

¶40

In vieu' of the same and^{for the reasons alike, this} Writ Petition is also^{disposedof directing the second} respondent-University^{to consider the vacancy arisil.rg out} of the subject category^{in terms of Clause-XXill of Rule IX} of the rules issued in^{G.O.Ms.No.155,Health Medical &}

¶41

Farnily Welfare (C1) Department dated lB.ll.2021 and

¶42

take action accordingly. If the petitioner is still aggrieved,

¶43

he can challenge the same in accordance with law.

¶44

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shal1

¶45

stand ciosed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶46

SD/-K.VENKAIAH

¶47

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' Cr',/ -:

¶48

SECTION OFFICER

¶49

To,

¶50

The Registrar, Kaloji Narayana^{Rao Universityof Health Sciences, Warangal}

¶51

One CC to SRI SRINIVASA^{RAO IVADIRAJU, Advocate [OPUC]} J. One CC to SRI A.PRABHAKAR^{RAO, SC for KNRU} IOPUCI

¶52

4 Two CCs to the GP for^{Medical, Health & Family Welfare, High Court for the} State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶53

Two C.D. Copies.

¶54

One Spare^CoPY.

MRC

't'R &

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 10412022

ORDER

WP.No.11311 of 2022

tlE S fA Ie
t
3 ) ,21APR iml
Y(+
\gl^.

¶62

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶63

^4tvv
9)' tr

Dr.M.Ravikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.M.Ravikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Tsrtc) and 2 Others Vs Sri Malothu Nehru

Ammula Kamala Deepti Vs The State of Telangana

Prof.Dastageer Alam Vs The Registrar

Chinya Keloth, Nizamabad Dist Vs the Govt. of a.P., Hyd and Another

M/s. Haricons Engineers and Contractors Vs Sri. Gurijala Sudhakar Reddy

D.M., Tsrtc Vs Gollamandala Subba Raju and Ano.