The Writ Appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs and adjudication on merits, as the appellant voluntarily withdrew the present writ appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT APPEAL NO:26 OF 2021
writ Appeal underclause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the orderdated 23t12t2020 in WP.No.12067o'f 202O-on the file of the HighCourt'
Between:
Ammula Kamala Deepti,D/o. Mr. Ammula Sushil Chandra, qged -31y9q9' oiCon ffor." Wite fUo Flatno. 201,kashishAvenueH. No 3-6-379/1 ' Streiet.No.2, HimayathNagar, Hyderabad- 500029
...AppELLANr
AND
3 ihe oe-outv Commissioner,GHMC, Circle No.16' Amberpet, Hyderabad' 4 fne Aiiiit6nt CityPlanner, Circle No.16,Ampep-e^t'Hyderabad 5 Sri VlienOra Tiwah, S/o S.B.TiwariRl/o FlatNo.303, Sai Kiran Apartments, Street No.2. Himavath Naqar,Hyderabad-500 029.
6 Si"i. i siikrrJriwlo Lite sriPadmanabhaPrasadaged aboul q3 years ocCpn. Housewife,Rl/o H. No. 3-6-379/1 , Second Street, Himayath Nagar' Hvderabad -500 029
IA NO:'l OF2O21
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in
the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the sanctiongrantedin favourof the Respondent no' 5 to 7 vide permit no. 2/C16i0665912020lile no. 21c161o641912020dated 25th June 2020, for the construction ofSth Floor on the already existing building H.No. 3-6-379/1, Street No.2, Himayath Nagar,Hyderabad pending disposalof the present Writ Appeal
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. SIVA PRASAD KURAKU
Counsel for Re:;pondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for Res;pondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for Res;pondent No. 5: SRI DEEPAK MISRA
Counsel for Res;pondent Nos. 6 &7: --
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
-lI I i I
\
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHAND RA SH AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND
WRIT No.26 of 2O2l
JT DGMENT: eer the Hon,bte the Chte.f Justice Satish Chandra Shamn)
Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, prays for withdrawal ol the present writ appeal. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
TO
SD/-CH.VEN KATESWARULU DEPUw //TRUE coPY//
tEJiIdTRAR SECTION OFFICER
q
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2010412022
t)
'{
i i::
2I $P ?ul
JUDGMENT
WA.No.26 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
Ur?$
C9
rO
WITHOUT COSTS
Ammula Kamala Deepti
The State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Assistant Commissioner, GHMC
Assistant City Planner
Sri Vhenora Tiwari
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinandkumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
