Writ petition challenging illegal and arbitrary summons to police station. Court disposed of the matter without adjudicating on merits, noting a complaint was lodged and action was taken according to law.
dismissed without adjudication on the legality of the summons procedure noting entitlement of police action on complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ,(SpecialOriginal Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 10732 OF 2022
Between:
THAKUR SEETHAL SINGH, S/o Takur Jaswanth Singh, Aged 48years, Occ Business, R/o H.No. 9-1-34191A, Bapunagar, Opp KosarajuHospital, Langer house, Golkonda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the RespondentsNo.4 and 5 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct theRespondent No. 4 and 5 herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police station Narsingi, Cyberabad without following the due process of law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Courtmay bepleasedto direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 herein not to call the Petitioner tothe Police
Station Narsingi, Cyberabad without following the dueprocess of lawpending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. SYED OSMAN
Counsel for the Respondent No's. 1 to 4: SRI A.MANOJ KUMAR, AGPFOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5:NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
, Ii
THE HON'BLE DT. ]USTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PET ITION No.10732 of 2022
9B9EB:
The petitioner herein seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5in unnecessarilycalling the petitioner to thepolice station asillegal, arbitraryand consequentty direct the respondentNos.4 and5 not to call the petitioner to the police station, without following the dueprocess of law.
iir \ ..1 \ l, I-:l :|::
2
amount and threatened him with dire consequences. Basing on the said complaint, the respondent No.4/SHO, Narsingi police Station, made a GD entry. Respondent No.4 called the petitioner to the police station for the purpose of enquiry.
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTM FICER
To,
Gfu'-
SB
HIGH COURT
DATED:0710312022
-,...,.: :-t I 1. , 1
e
ooJ il9 APB E2
0 ':.:;.r,.,
ORDER
WP.No.10732 ol 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS.
O
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be called to the police station for enquiry without following due process of law when no criminal case is pending against him.
Thakur Seethal Singh
The State of Telangana
Deputy Commissioner of Police Madhapur Zone
Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhapur
Station House Officer P.S Narsingi
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
