The High Court at Hyderabad disposed of Writ Appeal No. 1376 of 2008 as infructuous. Counsel for the appellants informed the Court that the appeal has no purpose, and no further order was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 1376 OF 2008
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order dated 7.7.2008 and made in WP.No.532 of 2006, on the file of the High Court.
Between:
(All are R/o.1-84, Dargah Hussaini Sha Ali, Seri Lingampally Mandal, R.R District)
...Petitioners/Appellants
ANO
...Respondents/Respondents
WAMP. NO 2676 0F 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petjtion, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Memo No. Dsi P5/30/2005 dated 29.12.2005 issued by the 1st respondent and to allow the legal representatives of (deceased) Revision petitioner petition fjled by the petltioners/appella nts herein pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRIATCHUTANANDADONDETI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FORREVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to9: SRIP.SHIV KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.10:SRIPADALA PRAVIN KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IION'BLETHE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRASIIARIVIA AND
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSIIAVILI
WRIT No.1376 of2004
JUDGMENT: tPel ttPtld'1btetie <:hL/ /rrs(r'e Sal$h Cha4dla Shamol
Learnedcounsel \'as fairenough 1n informingthis Court thatthe presentwrit appeal has becomeinfructuous
IS disposedofas Accordingly,the writaPPeal
infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions,ifanY' shall standclosed.
Theresha11be no order as to costs'
SDLCH
//TRUECOPY//
To, 1 . TwoCCS to theGP for ReVenue, Highcourt forthe Stateof Telangana[oUT.]
5, TwoC.D. CoPies 6.One SpareCoPY MRC NPJ
HIGH COURT
I
DATED:04/0212022
ORDER
WA.No.1376 of 2008
riL J iA ,E
:
o2 iii,l 2oz
)J no
5..
4,
:'.
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
34
Gali Aniaiah and others
The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
