Dismissed

M.M. Baig , Mirza Mahboob Baig, Secbad., and Anr. v. the Govt.of a.P.,Minorities,Hyd.,and 13 Otrs.

Telangana HC30 Mar 2022PIL/56/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two-judge Bench of the Telangana High Court disposed of PIL No. 56 of 2014, filed by Baig & Ors. against the Government of Andhra Pradesh and minority welfare bodies. The Court held the petition was infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The Public Interest Litigation disposed of as infructuous; pending miscellaneous applications closed.

M.M. Baig , Mirza Mahboob Baig, Secbad… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE S. OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY.,,*'. H ,*o i,i.i jli J5,f[,.llEn],offi n "

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA THE HONOURA"...*,,,.$ AND KUII4AR SHAVILI

PUBttct RES LITI

OF 14

Between:

Baig @Miza
worker, R/o H.No. 1
Khajg,l,Zake Mirza Ameer Baig, Occu: Social
erqddin s/o late. ,.Secunder ab ad
membbr, r/o
H.No. 1 din,, Occ U
Red Ex-Haj commiftee
eiabad.
AND
...PETITONERS
1. The Govern ment ofAndhra prade$h
2 Governmen t, Minorities We by special secretary to
A.P.State tM rnorities Finafrce
nt Secretariat Hyderabad
Public Gardens Nampatl Y, Hyde ltd;, Sth Floor, Haj Ho use, Opp
o.a S nManagil\4d.HidangDyath trector. (Andhra s/o Abdul P ve,rnment. byTh . Undertakin s)e Vice Chairman cum :
Haj House ,sthF rrman, RTC Stand Road
loor, Op!; Pubtic
4. Sri.Md.GulamG ouse s/o Abdul Nampally,,Hyderab Guntur. ad c/o
House, Sth,Fl Di recto r, Mahaboobna
oor, Opp:.pubii6 gar. clo Haj
Sri.Shaik Nazeer Aharhmed rNdiripaIlY, Hyderabad
mmed Saheb Director
.Kadapa. c/o Haj House, sth F Mochampet
Hyderabad. lic Gardens
Nampal ly,
Sri.lr4d.Wahe
MOh
clo Haj Ftori.s n,, Director, Siddipet, Meda k
7. Sri. ShaikA n Na mpally, Hyderabad_
Guntur. c/o Ha er,, Director, Ba patla,
Hydeiabad. ic:Ga rdens, Nampally,
B. Sri.ltzld.Jameer
Khah Md:
,,Director
District. c/o Haj Hous6, 5thF G unam konda Chittoor
Hyderabad. Garde ns, Nampaliy,
9. Sri.Syed Hamed H ussain
Hyderabad. c/o H aJ Hous A{l Jaffri ,, Director,
Hyderabad. Garde ns, Nampally,
10. Sri.Alankur Fayaz slo A
Haj House, 5th Floor, O 'Saheb ,, Direetor, Old Town , Ananthapur, c/o
'1 1. Sri.Sk.Faza lic Ga rdens Nampatly, Hyderabad
Haj House, Direct or, Rayachoti, Kadapa Distri ct. c/o
ic Gardens,,Nampalty, Hyderabrad

¶8

l
i
I

¶9

1) t.: -i--.

¶10

Kh^{a n s/ o F a zul} r1l" ilIHil 3J5i]3 l'[l'"^{" "'}

¶11

,, :,:'-xf ,l A'g:&[?[""ln ,.it.,.iX,H,$yJ1lytrif:S,x,..'-,iJ',f"'5i'#Jti:.";;lln,'1"ffi : o "'**o'ff'llf 'j i'''

¶12

,, 3 l*:lXlt;^{d' M u st ara s/o H a m ed Y a h'} "'^{!11"''l",jo fl} '" Enii-;r-oi;trict. c/o Hai^{House' sth Floor' upp:} ...RESPoNDENTS

¶13

ilyJlrrnuo.

¶14

petition under.Articre"2r,?,::Jll",,B"J.illllli^l,nlt[ii-.iJi:Silii:i,il'[: circumstances^stated.-ln

¶15

rs#+Nn+rn[*'l..+:q:**; Pradesh^{State Minortttes tt}

¶16

Pradesh^{State Minortttes tt}

¶17

l.A. NO:^{1 OF 2014(PILMP' NO: 69 OF 2014)}

¶18

Petition^{under Section 151 CPC praying'thatin the circumstancesstated in} i;n' |"";* I 1, it..g' ?::ffi] tn " attio-ul^{t i, eoi n suplSl} 1[T"rSX?il i:;.t susoerid^{the oPeratton} B1:J"ni""'i,'i*:71-z.zot+Jn^{t'" tit" of Respondent No l '}

¶19

doun=et^{torttre rpeiition"iitsnt'RAJ KUMAR RUDRA}

¶20

Counsel^{for the Respondent No' 1: GP FORSOCIAL WELFARE}

¶21

Counsel forthe^{Respondent No' 2: SRI'K' RAMANJA CHARY}

¶22

Counsel forlhe^{Respondent No' 3: SRI' SUBHANIS'M'}

¶23

Counsel for^{the RespondentNos' 4lo14:.}

¶24

The Court^{made the following:}

¶25

¶26

¶27

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUS^{TICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA}

¶28

AND

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND^KUMARSHAVILI

¶30

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION^{No.56 OF 2O14}

¶31

ORDER, fp- rr'r Hon'bte^{the chiefJusnce sahshcha'ldrushanno)}

¶32

Learned for the^{petitioners is fair enoughin statingbefore} this Court that the^{presentpublic interestlitigation has become} infructuous.

¶33

The public interest litigation^{is accordingly disposed of as} infructuous.

¶34

Pending miscellaneous applications,^{if any, shallstand}

¶35

closed. There shall be no order^{as to costs.}

SD/-K.AMMAJI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

t -U)

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Special Secretary to Government, lvlinorities Welfare (EcDM)

¶43

Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶44

Z. -^{TttS-Yic_e*ghairmancum Managi ng Director. (And hra PradeshGovernment} Undertaking) A.P.State Minorities Finance Corporation Ltd,, sth Floor, Haj Hiiuse, Opp: Public Gardens, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶45

1. One CC to Sri.Raj Kumar Rudra, Advocate IOPUC] 4. One CC to Sri.K. Raman.ia Chary,^Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri.subhani S.M.,^Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Social^{Welfare,High Court for the State of Telangana'} tourl

¶46

1. Two CD CoPies.

HIGH COURT

DATED:30/03/2022

ORDER

1
(
c-
\ r,) 2 4 AIJB 2022
OE

¶53

PIL.No.56 of 2014

¶54

ing of the PIL ut costs.

M.M. Baig , Mirza Mahboob Baig, Secbad., and Anr. v. the Govt.of a.P.,Minorities,Hyd.,and 13 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.M. Baig , Mirza Mahboob Baig, Secbad., and Anr. v. the Govt.of a.P.,Minorities,Hyd.,and 13 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kingshuk Nag, Vs The Chief Election Commissioner

Indian Child Welfare forum, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

G.Prabhakar Rao, Hyderabad. Vs Secy., Aperc., Hyderabad and 2 Others

T.Dhangopal Rao, Vs Secy., Minstry of Law and Justice, New Delhi, and 2 Others

A. Revanth Reddy, Hyderabad Vs Prl. Secretary, Medical and Family Welfare Dept., Hyd and 2 Othe

N. Kameshwara Aditya, Vs the Prl.Secy.,Medical Health and Family Welfare DEPT.,HYD.,AND4

Telangana Communist Party, Warangal Dist. Vs Prl. Secy., Intermediate Education and 4 Ors.

Madupu Venugopal Rao and 6 Ors. Vs Prl. Secy., M.A. and U.D. Dept. and 6 Ors.

Donepudi Nageshwara Rao, Visakhapatnam Dist Vs D. Ramachandra Reddy, Hyd and 2 Others

A. Sunitha Vs P. Sudha Rani

A.Sunitha Vs R.C. Misra

Mogili Hemalatha, Hyd Vs Secy, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Financial Services, AND2OT

Chitrapuri Porata Sangam Vs The State of Telangana and 23 Others

Domala Ilaiah, S/o. D.Mallaiah, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary of