The Civil Revision Petitioner challenged an interim order granting time to file an appeal. The High Court dismissed the revision without examining merits as the impugned order remains effective.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6274 OF 20'12
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 5111112 in lA No. 489 ot 2012 O.S.No: 14'lh6 on the file of the Court of the ll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Fouzan Alladin, S/o. Habib Alladin, Age:. 44 Years, Ryo. Shangrilla Apartments, Road No. 9 Banjara Hills Hyderabad - 34
...PETITIONER/PETITIONERYDEFENDANT
AND
M/s. Hyderabad Industries Ltd., (formerly M/s. Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Ltd) Regd. Office at Sanathnagar Hyderabad -'18, Rep. by Chief Financial Officer & Authorized Signatory Ashok Soni.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
CRPMP. NO: 8346 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings in OS No. 3183/2011 on the file of the Vth Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad pending disposal of the CRP.
For the Petitioner: Eranki Phani Kumar
Forthe Respondent: T Bala Mohan Reddy
The Court made the following: ORDER
I \
I I
THE HON'RLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY C.R.P.No.6274 of 2Ol2
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is fiied under Article 227 of the Con stitution of India by the revision petitioner/ defendant assailing the order dated 05.11.2012 in IA No.4B9 of 2Ol2 in OS No.3iB3 of 2O1l on the file of the V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. But, as per the cause titie of the grounds ol appeal, pursuant to the order dated 20.07.2022 in IA No.1 of 2022, the name of the trial Court is changed as II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.
PaEe 2 of 2
AVRJ CRP No.6274 of2(tll
I
the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed without iooking into the merits or otherwise of the claim of the revision petitioner/ defendant. However, in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this revision petition, shall stand closed.
To,
Sd/. NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE Copy// (ltt SECTION OFFICER
'1. The ll Senior Civit Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
HIGH COURT
AVRJ
DATED: 2611012022
ORDER
CRP.No.6274 of 2012
\ ? giAIi
rr 21 trtt N[
:.)
.a-
t .... -. ..,. :: ' .','7
-:-: - - -::4.?-
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed
.*'
${>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim order granting time for filing an appeal can be challenged via a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227.
Fouzan Alladin
M/s. Hyderabad Industries Ltd.
A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
