Dismissed

Anil Kumar Reddy Aduri, v. Basani Prakash Reddy

Telangana HC13 Oct 2022CRP/4420/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a civil revision petition under Section 15 of the CPC. The court held the matter infructuous as the lower order operated on an inherent jurisdiction petition where the further proceedings were already stayed by a criminal revision petition on the merits before the Supreme Court, which was pending disposal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Anil Kumar Reddy Aduri, Vs Basani Prakash… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[³²¹⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4420 OF 2014

¶7

Petition under Section^'1 15 of CPC aggrieved by the order dated 21 .08.2014 in No. l.A. o'f 282 of 2013 in O.S.^'1994 of 2011 on the file of the Hon'ble llnd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Anil Kumar Reddy Aduri,, S/o. IVareddy, Ageed:40 years, Occ:Business and Agriculture, Residing at Flat No. GF-8, Venkata SaiVila, Street No. 5, H. No. 42-610113811 , M.J. Colony, Near Water Tank, [/oulali,Reang Reddy District.

¶10

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Basani Prakash Reddy,, S/o. Late Inna Reddy, Aged:55 years,Occ:Business and Agrbilure, Residing at FlatNo.608, White House Apartment, H.No.B-267 4l2l2A, Road No.-1 3, Banjara Hills,Hyderabad-500034.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYRESPONDENT

¶14

l.A. NO: 'l OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 6041 OF 2014)

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.'1994 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Range Reddy District, at L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:MS. CH. SUKHAPALS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI

¶17

SESHADRI GOALLA, ADVOCATE

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: PUSHADAPU SUBBA RAO, ADVOCATE

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLI SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWA]UT REDDY CIVIL R }VISION PETITION NO.442O OIT 2014

¶21

QB.DPR:

¶22

Heard ls.Ch. Sukhapala, Advocate on b,:[-tr:ll of Sri Seshadri Golla, learned counsel for tht rc'rision petitioner. -earned counsel for the rt'spond,,rnt also present. Le irned counsel Ms.Ch.Sukhapala s,eel(s to submit that lre matter has become infructttor Ls at rd no CALI SE SU T,'I 'E S Accordingly, while recor,l i Lrg the submissions rn behalf of revision petitioner. this Civil Revision Peti ion is dismissed as infructuous ll.r the circumstance . of the case, there shall be no order 1s lo the costs. Misce laneous applications, if an1, pr:ntling, shall

¶23

stand closed.

¶24

SD/- K. SAILESHI OEPU'ry REGISTRAR i/TRUE COPY// ' i-, SI:CTlCrN OFFICER

¶25

To,

¶26

'1. The ll Addl Seni, r Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy Dist., at LB N,rgar, Hyderabad.

¶27

One CC to SRI I ESHADRI GOALLA, Advocate IOPUCI

¶28

One CC to SRI F JSHADAPU SUBBA RAO, Advocate [OpUCl

¶29

Two CD Copies

¶30

One Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

DATED::1 3110,2022

r,1 ,r€ c)
[ :] l:l 2lli2
./

¶35

ORDER

¶36

CRP.No.4420 of 2014

¶37

DISMISSED I S INFRUCTUOUS

¶38

tB lt

Anil Kumar Reddy Aduri, v. Basani Prakash Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Anil Kumar Reddy Aduri, v. Basani Prakash Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The District Collector, Vs Assistant Commissioner

Gulla Anjaiah Vs Maravena Yadagiri

Raheem Khan, Karimnagar Vs Muzeebunnisa Begum, Karimnagar and 4 Others

Ashok Kumar Gupta, Hyderabad Vs Mrs. Rama Devi Joshi, Hyderabad and 8 Others

Mr. Mohammed Yousuf Vs the Governmet of Telanagana and 4 Others

The Sub-Divisional Forest Officer, Nizamabad Vs B.Mahesh Kumar