This order dismisses a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 by default due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear or present representation on the hearing date despite prior notice for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3218 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOUR,ABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4126 oF 2015
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 13-08-20 15 in LA. No.91 of 2015 in R.C. No.41 of 2Ot4 on the file of the Court of the Prl. Rent Controller cum Xll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Ashok Kumar G_upta, Hyderabqd, S/g late lvladanlal Gupta, Age 60 years, Occ: Business, N o. 14-7-206, Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad. rr+isiou
..f ETITIONER/ R€spoNcgfu i,o-f
AND
... RESPON DENTSI rzr:sPoPoaw G{o t{
t..A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRP MP. NO:5476 O F 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in RC.No. 41 of 2014 posted to 2S-O9-2O15 on the file of principal Rent controller, Hyderabad be grant any other relief to which the petitionei is entitled to may also be granted.
Counsel for the Revision Petitioner: SRI P. PANDURANGA RAO(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
c.R.P. NO. 4126 0F 2015
ORDER:
None appears on behalf of the revision petitioner. As per the proceeding sheet dated 24.O8.2O22, there was no representation on either side and accordingly c:n 2O.O9.2022 it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal".
Hence, presence or representation on behalf of the revision petitioner is quite essential to proceed further.
Accordingly, as the revision petitioner is not evincing any interest and there is no representation consequent to the proceedings dated 2O.O9.2O22, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in
this revision petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /ITRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
"';$:{+ert#l-:'J:il":::':::':"'::":;J":Jl:::: toPucl
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311012022
ORDER
CRP.No.4126 of 2015
RTHE$ t4
0g .litr
r -,ll ttn
a
DISMISSING OF THE CRP FOR NON.PROSECUTION
Ashok Kumar Gupta
Mrs. Rama Devi Joshi
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
