The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous on the submission that no cause survives, holding there shall be no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous applications closed.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.t
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N O: 4056 OF 2015
Petition under Section 22 of the A. P. Buildings Lease Eviction and Rent Control Act, aggrieved by the order daled 27.01_20'15, passed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courl at Hyderabad, in R.A.NO.24l2012, there by confirming the orders passed in R.C.NO.123 of 2007,dated.28.10.20'l 1,on the fite of The l Additionat Rent Controller6ity Small Causes Court Hyderabad.
Between:
C, D. GANDHI, HYDERABAD, S/o Late Dharamsi, Occ: Business fb 15-2-9, Gowliguda Chaman, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
GOWRI SHANKAR SANGHI, HYDERABAD, S/o Late Shyam Sunder Sanghi, Occ Advocate No 21-2-444, Charkaman, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRPMP. NO: 5398 OF 2015)
Petition under Section'15'1 of C.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment passed in RA No.24 of 2012 dated 27 .O1 .2015 passed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petltioner : Ms. BHARGAVI SRt. AADESH VARMA
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRt MRIGENDRA SANGHI
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CTVIL REVISI ON PETITION NO. 4056 0F 201s
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel Ms.Bhargavi on behalf of Sri Aadesh Varma, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that the matter has become infructuous as no cause survives. While recording the submissions of learned counsel on behalf of petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shafl be no order as to the costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
//TRUE COPY/i
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR -lrr. ,q.uP'-
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
'.F
Pcsd
bs
HIGH COURT
DATEDt10l10l2022
ORDER
CRP.No.4056 of 2015
+le STril,: -:- ,<br>c-
.: 'i\ . t.
,, ,1
- t,:
tl [E[ "'rt
../
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
@ gi,-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition survives as the underlying matter has become infructuous.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
C.D. GANDHI
GOWRI SHANKAR SANGHI
A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
